> It is without any scientific merit, and it is devoid of morality.
Even if your predictions here are true (I always love teasing people about confident claims of nonexistence, and the "smarter" the person the more fun it is): so what?
> So, I stand by my comment. I will not, however, spend the next eight months of my life arguing with people who defend this moron. And he is a moron.
Humans tend to prefer remaining as they are instead of improving, and you're welcome to it, but watch out for the consequences.
> And, my background is in epigenetics, lipids, and embryogenesis.
Ah, I have a "scientific" thinker on my hands do I?
> Again, he is remarkably ignorant.
You are welcome to your opinion, and you are also welcome to avoid distinguishing opinion from fact (but again, note that there may be consequences).
> I do not need to spend any time "improving" this opinion of Trump
This reasoning style has been covered above (poor cognition can have negative consequences).
> but I will spend time improving my understanding of the mRNA vaccine-related science
You may *aspire* to it, but be careful assuming success. Also be careful assuming that science is the only domain that has substantial relevance to covid or vaccines.
> For now, we can see that the mRNA vaccines are triggering mutations in the PI3K molecule which can (and will) trigger cancer and autoimmune pathways in vulnerable people.
Excellent work. Does science have any insight into the harm caused by their behavior, and that of their fan base?
> If you have a counter-argument against this claim then state it, smarty pants. Tell me why Trump is not an idiot regarding the mRNA vaccines? Make your case.
See above. Now, let's see how "you" respond, Human. Considering your lack of even acknowledging much of what I said above in response to your "laying down of the facts" (which we have now found to be something other than that), I am not getting my hopes up.
> Say what you will, but I don't need to do any of the things you suggest.
In an absolute sense you sure don't, but if you desire your (sub-perceptual) model of reality to more closely match the real thing, you would need to.
> Just look at what he said. It is remarkably ignorant.
Are you able to realize the relevance of this to your claim about "reality" here?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_and_indirect_realism
> It is without any scientific merit, and it is devoid of morality.
Even if your predictions here are true (I always love teasing people about confident claims of nonexistence, and the "smarter" the person the more fun it is): so what?
> So, I stand by my comment. I will not, however, spend the next eight months of my life arguing with people who defend this moron. And he is a moron.
Humans tend to prefer remaining as they are instead of improving, and you're welcome to it, but watch out for the consequences.
> And, my background is in epigenetics, lipids, and embryogenesis.
Ah, I have a "scientific" thinker on my hands do I?
> Again, he is remarkably ignorant.
You are welcome to your opinion, and you are also welcome to avoid distinguishing opinion from fact (but again, note that there may be consequences).
> Of course I am welcome to my opinion. And you are welcome to yours.
a) Please represent your opinions as opinions, not as facts.
b) Are you asserting or implying (perhaps unintentionally) that everything I've written here is *only* opinion, or that all opinions are equal?
> My opinion: Trump is an idiot.
Agreed, as are all humans.
> I feel certain of this fact with regard to the Covid mRNA vaccines, which is what my original comment was about.
You weren't a fan of Operation Warp Speed, that Trump supported?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Warp_Speed
> I do not need to spend any time "improving" this opinion of Trump
This reasoning style has been covered above (poor cognition can have negative consequences).
> but I will spend time improving my understanding of the mRNA vaccine-related science
You may *aspire* to it, but be careful assuming success. Also be careful assuming that science is the only domain that has substantial relevance to covid or vaccines.
> For now, we can see that the mRNA vaccines are triggering mutations in the PI3K molecule which can (and will) trigger cancer and autoimmune pathways in vulnerable people.
Excellent work. Does science have any insight into the harm caused by their behavior, and that of their fan base?
> If you have a counter-argument against this claim then state it, smarty pants. Tell me why Trump is not an idiot regarding the mRNA vaccines? Make your case.
See above. Now, let's see how "you" respond, Human. Considering your lack of even acknowledging much of what I said above in response to your "laying down of the facts" (which we have now found to be something other than that), I am not getting my hopes up.
> I genuinely hope you enjoy your day.
You as well!!