122 Comments

They fund Islamist terrorists who kill Americans. They collaborate with Mexican cartels who traffic drugs and kids and women. They collaborate with the CCP who also kills Americans. The list is much longer, but you get the point. All these entities hate us and regard us as the enemy, yet we support them, give them money. Meanwhile we stab our friends in the back. How is our government different from the criminals they support? And if they work with all these entities that hate us, how can you expect that they feel any differently? They work against us.They don’t work for us.

Expand full comment

It certainly looks like Epstein was some sort of op -- meaning that the swamp will literally sex traffic minors in order to get blackmail.......

Expand full comment

Epstein was much more than that. Watch an interview of Whitney Webb by Glenn Beck. Well worth it.

Expand full comment

Traitors, all. 😡

Expand full comment

Massie. Paul. No more than 533 traitors.

Expand full comment

Actually ackshully axelley

They’re just actors.

We’d get up there, drag them to the Tumbrels and they’d say the first honest words ever..

... it was just acting

I just wanted to be a celebrity

Expand full comment

Yeah, remember Fast and Furious?

Expand full comment

Of course.

Expand full comment

They also got you in WW1 and WW2, wars all over the Middle Eas and Asia. Meddling in every Nations business, installing puppet governments all over the world etc etc

All whilst ignoring the needs of the American people

Expand full comment

Yes, hostages should be first priority... for normal humans. Our elected representatives are not normal humans. All human events/tragedies are pretexts for more money laundering and kick back schemes. Always. They don’t care about hostages. Whether they live or die matters not one whit, unless their death were to either end a kick back scheme or open up another scheme. The more wars and hostages the better... more opportunities for more money laundering.

Expand full comment

men with guns seem to get funding. and here’s the funny thing. men with guns should be the last people to speak on any topic...but they never wait their turn. why? because they know that if all the talking really happens, they may not get a turn at all, the guns won’t be needed. if there’s one thing a man with authoritarian tendencies wants, it’s to use that gun.

Expand full comment

Men with guns should be the only ones talking in war.

As it happens, they are...

Expand full comment

you miss the point entirely. war is the failure of diplomacy, or talking. i reassert my position.

Expand full comment

That’s funny.

Bismarck thought differently, as did Metternich...

As does history..

And today’s news...

But let me ask you; why should the men with guns fight for you or your government then? Since they have no say.

Expand full comment

Can you imagine the US sending troops anywhere under current conditions? They've written off the entire warrior class as White Supremacist terrorists, none of whom would put their life on the line for this regime. What is left are queers, ginks, low education boss girls, and hollow chested grievance study majors. The US can't even produce material goods anymore. Just increasingly worthless money, and that process is going to come to an abrupt end sooner rather than later.

Expand full comment

Wish I could give you a hundred likes for that comment.

Expand full comment

They have lost the American Warrior Caste.

Beyond doubt.

What remains isn’t queer, etc but usually foreign born. Not bad fellows or our enemies.

Actually they’re walking too 🤣

Expand full comment

Oh well. Honestly, I think we're better off keeping the warrior class out of that system and close to home.

Expand full comment

What is a gink?

Expand full comment

An idiot, loser or general moronic person. Chicago slang.

http://onlineslangdictionary.com/meaning-definition-of/gink

Expand full comment

nothing until every hostage is returned.

Expand full comment

At best, as a first condition, but not as a last. I would prefer to send nothing. Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan et al have money.

Expand full comment

be that as it may, return all hostages immediately has to be the first unconditional demand. no rewards for mass slaughter and rape.

Expand full comment

That horse has already left the barn.

Expand full comment

But they have their hands full taking in all the Palestinian refugees!

Expand full comment

Maybe send some money to the people in Hawaii who lost their en....

WHITE SUPREMACIST! FAR RIGHT!!! BIGOTRY OF THE HIGHEST ORDER!

Expand full comment

During Biden's speech I wanted to make a comment about how he remembered as a child how he would go and pass out meals to Nazi troops who were bravely fighting against Russia and Hitler (somehow.)

Expand full comment

Don’t you mean he was told he “was the first American President” to feed the Nazis on the Russian front?

Expand full comment

He fought bravely at the Battle of the Bulge too; that was after he somehow survived the attack on Pearl Harbor. He may even remember seeing the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand as well.

Expand full comment

You're being unkind. Don't you know his son Beau died serving on the USS Arizona at Pearl Harbor?

Expand full comment

My bad.

At least Biden hasn't claimed any first-hand memories of Civil War battles. So far.

Expand full comment

"My son Beau died at Shiloh."

Expand full comment

When I play monopoly, I spend my money with more thought and reservation. The money is equally fake, but it is mine.

Expand full comment

it's early in the morning for me and I'm not sure how to put it, but...the Democrat instinct these days is to "always find and support the victim" ... but only if the victim ... is the right "kind" of victim, which given the intersectionality of grievance politics can be quite hard. It's a game of rock, paper, scissors, but 6 kinds of rocks, 12 kinds of scissors, and 4 colors of paper.

Expand full comment

They literally judge people by the color of their skin rather than the content of their character.

Expand full comment

Our PM is currently on a diplomatic tour of the area, he's in Egypt today. We're sending money our country doesn't have to Israel. The Scottish first minister has asked for everyone to take in Palestinian refugees - forgetting of course that Westminster will fund such a programme not Holyrood. Of course we probably already do, thousands of young middle Eastern men cross the English Channel every day illegally and nobody has any idea who they are or where they are from....

Expand full comment

The governor of California is also in Israel. It's optics tourism.

Expand full comment

Well, he's pitching for the Dem nomination, isn't he so.....aye, optics. I prefer optics of a different kind (yes, I will have a blackberry Slingsby gin and tonic, thank you 😂) but that's me 😉

Expand full comment

It's like they're living in another reality.

Rafi Farber is convinced that the collapse of the dollar will end the wars. Maybe he's right. The US dollar is funding wars everywhere.

Expand full comment

When the US dollar collapses, the next emerging global power will fund the wars. Someone will always fund the wars.

Expand full comment

I don't think so, Chris. Who else wants to waste money that way? China has its own troubles, Russia as well. I think the unique circumstances of post-WWII economies gave the US a rare advantage, That, and the flower of our youth allowed itself to be used in subsequent conflicts to make the world safe for democracy or whatnot.

Can you tell I'm disillusioned?

Expand full comment

The WEF etc. LOVE wars - war kills a lotta people much faster then turbo cancer even. Especially those ‘troublesome young males.’

Expand full comment

The WEF doesn't have money. You think Klaus Schwab pays for anything? No, they suck the money from the people - mostly from the people here in the US. Once the dollar collapses, it's over. Our leaders have already stolen $21 trillion from us. They're keeping this sh*tshow going as long as they can, then they'll run.

Expand full comment

Forever and ever. That's why someone with their head screwed on straight has to carry the biggest bat at all times. We let that guy go rouge on our dime.

Expand full comment

Chris is right. Someone else will pick up the tab. Farbers comment reminds of Fukuyama’s end of history theory in ‘91.

Expand full comment

Tell me "who" is going to pick up the tab. I'm waiting.

Expand full comment

No idea but history would indicate someone will as someone always has. Do you think in the 1930s the world thought the US would be the one to pick up the tab in the future? When the dollar collapses do you believe nothing will follow? Something will fill that void and keep the tab going. It’s human nature.

Expand full comment

Of course I don't think "nothing" will follow. I'm just saying that the US won't be able to finance wars after dedollarization.

Expand full comment

Been plenty of wars long before the US dollar came on the scene. There is always someone willing to bet on war.

Expand full comment

You responded to it at 8:19 PST. Your last post was sent at 16:05 PST per the time stamp.

Expand full comment

That is not at all what you said. You claimed that Farber stated “...collapse of the dollar will end the wars.” Chris rebutted that someone would follow, the same position I’m taking, and you retorted with “I don’t think so...”. In all your response you defend the no more wars if the dollar collapses position.

Expand full comment

OK, no more US-led wars.

Tell me who will finance wars if not the US. Seriously.

Expand full comment

Who will pay?

China.

Russia.

India.

>>> The Gulf Arabs. <<<

Not an exhaustive list.

Did wars end with the collapse of the British Pound and British Empire?

The US led wars because we got sucked into European wars by England. Neither Wilson nor FDR wanted to, events took us there.

Wars are only as expensive as the powers want or can afford.

Good heavens all of Africa was overrun by warlords, much still is.. it’s not that expensive, especially if the enemy or your own country pays. Kony is fine living on the cheap.

Mercenaries are cheap now, and plentiful (a normal consequence of wars). When Ukraine ends the survivors will head to Africa, or wherever.

Expand full comment

Asked and answered above. you also agreed with that answer.

Expand full comment

I "like" as politeness in a conversation, not necessarily in agreement. I'd still like to hear who you think will finance the wars once our economy collapses. We are the biggest warmongers on the planet.

Expand full comment

i once read a blogger, an expat survivalist guy who i think lived in Chile. he said "to your government, you are a milk cow." that any government, no matter how benign in appearance, would reach a point where it viewed it's citizens as sources of all it's revenue, to be milked until dry and then dispensed with. i'm feeling these days that he was right. they don't even ask us anymore or care how we might feel about being drained.

Expand full comment

We should at least consider Elizabeth Warren as the sickly whore who keeps supporting the drunken, dying loser, right?

Expand full comment

Why you disrespecting whores?

Expand full comment

Good one! ;-D

Expand full comment

On the whaling topic: In the late 19th century, it was clear to the whalers the game was coming to a close. It was ever harder to find ever fewer whales. Since whalers could not agree to any type of self or external regulation, and they had too much committed, it became a race to kill the last whale.

I often wonder if the cabal is in a similar predicament.

Is "funding both sides" (with the requisite graft) grabbing all of the goodies before 2024?

Expand full comment

The funding ALWAYS includes graft. Let's see how much Zelenskyy is worth now, as compared to Feb 2022. If only we could see those figures for Pelosi, Miss Lindsey et al. Every time they make a trip to Ukraine, they come home with a little sumpinsumpin in their bags, you know it as well as I do.

Expand full comment

Sometimes I wonder what WW2 would have been like if there'd been the Internet, social media and an overwhelming urge to make war nicer.

Expand full comment

Under those circumstances, WW2 would still be going on.

Expand full comment

We'd be speaking German and enjoying schnitzel.

Expand full comment

I can see this

Expand full comment

No better proof the U.S. dollar is well on its way to being worthless than the ease with which our representative form of government gives it away.

Expand full comment

I was a very young man when she ran as a “mother in tennis shoes.” All these years later, she’s nothing but a checkbook spitting cliches. We need term limits.

Expand full comment

Not Warren. Someone from Washington state.

Expand full comment

You’re right! I read this before my coffee and thought he was talking about Patty Murray. They’re all interchangeable at this point. ;)

Expand full comment

I missed Patty Murray describing herself that way. I'll be in the bathroom, vomiting.

Expand full comment

They are interchangeable. I just looked it up now to be sure.

Expand full comment

The "mom in tennis shoes" was Patty Murray, I think. Senator from Washington, since 1993. Elizabeth Warren is a senator from Massachusetts, since 2013.

Expand full comment