106 Comments

Homeschool if possible and, if not, think about moving. I live in a deep blue State and I've known multiple parents where the child gets caught up in the trans propaganda. Everybody thinks it won't happen to their child. Don't be so sure.

Expand full comment

My wife and I live in Los Angeles. A few years ago, California passed a law banning unvaccinated students from public school, so we had no choice but to homeschool our daughter. I am very grateful that they forced our hand on this, because she has been receiving a far better education than her older siblings received, and we have made friends with other families who share our values. Had the legislature been slightly less tyrannical, we probably would have put up with public school and all the dependency and degeneracy that comes with it. Instead we have a daughter who is healthier and better educated than average, ideally positioned to raise a family of her own some day.

The present law, which awards child custody to whichever parent denies their child's biological sex, will further decimate childbirth and family formation. What is the long-term consequence of that?

By passing laws like this, blue-state politicians are sealing their fate. They are driving moderates like me and my wife out of their control systems while destroying the fertility of their most loyal supporters. Sure, they can loot and burn a great deal more in the short term, and that is undoubtedly the whole point. But parents who sexually mutilate and inject their children with the poison du jour will have few if any grandchildren. Within one generation our current lords and masters are on course to vax and groom away their entire political base. Paraphrasing Keynes, in the long run, they are all dead.

The best and surest way to defeat the sterility cultists is simply to outbreed them. I pray you will join me in this, because I can't father all the children myself, though heaven knows I've tried.

Expand full comment

Well put. It is a self-eradicating policy.

Expand full comment

🤞

Expand full comment

Children must not be allowed on the Internet. If you think your child needs to do anything online, you must be present.

Expand full comment

The trick is for the powerful to always have a means of invalidating and threatening you. Double binds are perfect for that.

Expand full comment

Yes. Every move you can make is a losing move, and you know it. The point is to demean the subject and break the will of a dominated people. We're out-Eastern Blocing the Eastern Bloc.

Expand full comment

The trick is criminalize or quasi-criminalize everything so no on has a clear path to their own rights.

It starts by greasing the pole to any kind of platform where your voice can be heard. Then they police the platform. Eventually, and I mean SOON, they will use the secret control of young people to police private speech at home. The Nazis, Maoist, and Soviets did that. Why not these neo-totalitarians?

Expand full comment

It's for the children!

Expand full comment

Look at Ireland: any material in your phone or on your computer deemed likely to cause unease in others are a crime.

You don't have to send anything or post anything or even mention it to anyone, just that it exists is enough for a prison sentence, public shaming in the press, losing access to your bank-accounts and being fired.

Expand full comment

So, does it work the other way around? If someone is uneasy with transgender people/material will the trans offender be punished as well? I would guess not, making the law about beliefs rather than actual offenses.

Expand full comment

That last part, teaching kids to narc on their parents for wrongghink at home was already underway in college prep schools pre-covid.

Expand full comment

Great answer, thanks!

Expand full comment

“We’re number one!”

Expand full comment

Sounds right but how about an example?

Expand full comment

Sorry, I didn't realize this was a question for me. It looked like it was in the main thread.

Article 58 in the Soviet penal code criminalized "anti-revolutionary activities." The definition of these was undefined. So, a person could be told by the government to escort a foreigner to their various destinations in Moscow and the next week accused of anti-revolutionary activities for doing so.

If you haven't read the Gulag Archipelago, it's full of this shit. Basically, the NKVD had officers making money and gaining power off of prison labor, so they would put out all kinds of directives one after the other that conflicted at the same time or contradicted the previous doctrine. Then they'd have a crime waiting for any law-abiding (if that's even possible) citizen they might want to get out of the way or just exploit to fill their quotas.

Expand full comment

See also the Cultural Revolution, where this week's favored parties were next week's purge victims, in a long cycle of rising and falling. People taking the approved action on Monday were dangerous criminals on Tuesday.

Expand full comment

I am told that the chances of a person actually being "transgender" is one in fifty-thousand. If 30% of the class is claiming to be "trans" then you know it's a social contagion like the anorexia fad that led to the death of Karen Carpenter and many less famous women.

Expand full comment

It’s called ‘gender dysphoria’ and it is a ‘mental illness’.

Expand full comment

Who told you that ?

Expand full comment

A transgender person.

Expand full comment

Government only has one tool, and it will use the giant sledgehammer of force to remove kids from families -- and the kids will no doubt use this knowledge to their advantage (whatever THAT looks like).

Expand full comment

South Park did an episode on that, didn't they? Everyone had been "molestered" and all the adults were sent away?

Expand full comment

Had to share this, just saw it on Facebook:

THURSDAY JOKE: cuz we all need a giggle!

A Texan, A Floridian, and a Californian all die and go to hell. While there, they spy a red phone and ask what the phone is for.

The devil tells them it is for calling back to Earth.

The Texan asks to call Dallas and talks for 5 minutes. When he is finished, the devil informs him that the cost is a million dollars, so the Texan writes him a check.

Next the Floridian calls Miami and talks for 30 minutes. When he is finished, the devil informs him that the cost is 6 million dollars, so he writes him a check.

Finally the Californian gets his turn he calls Sacramento and talks for 4 hours. When he is finished, the devil informs him that the cost is $5.00. When the Texan hears this, he goes ballistic and asks the devil why the Californian got to call Sacramento so cheaply.

The devil smiles and replies, "Since Gavin Newsome took over, the state has gone to hell, so it's a local call."

Expand full comment

When they say "affirm your child's gender", in plain English they mean "eagerly offer up your child for ritual mutilation".

Expand full comment

Didn’t som guy named Heller write a book about this? Think they made a movie.

Expand full comment

Catch22

Expand full comment

Every person who approved this bill should be put on the sex offender list and never be allowed within 100 feet of any children.

Expand full comment

Schrodinger’s kid

☹️

Expand full comment

Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed not because the people were evil, but their laws were evil. In other words, the laws required you to do evil. Does anyone see any similarities?

Expand full comment

Pull the kids from school.

In a choice between illiterate and raped&castrated you choose illiterate.

Expand full comment

The way most schools are preforming it would be illiterate, raped & castrated.

Expand full comment

Yes. The premise that public education is about learning is false. We already have a generation of young adults who literally know nothing yet think they're never wrong. All bets are off for the unfortunate generation behind them being subjected to gender and Covid propaganda in addition to the standard race and climate indoctrination. The idea that they will be running things in thirty years or so would be terrifying if I wasn't already old.

Expand full comment

Children belong to the State, not to families. This new standard being set is for a new reality that is being formed in the minds of children where new expectations are being programmed. People will have no bonds to family or community and thus the State will have full authority over everyone.

This link shows what is taking place in Russia today, coming to our schools likely very soon.

https://edwardslavsquat.substack.com/p/cattle-tags-help-you-learn-better

Expand full comment

Get out of that state while you can. Run. Wild horses won't get me to so much as visit. Hell hole. Please don't talk about the nice weather.

Expand full comment

Yes, but one can only run so far.

Expand full comment

This is what I call Drunk Logic. Unfortunately the drunks are in charge and the judges have been doing shots along with them. Scary stuff.

Expand full comment

This agenda is being pushed with huge force all over:

https://media.scored.co/scale/u2gZxB3DzH4pY9jD.jpeg

Expand full comment

Disgusting.

Expand full comment

It is only a very few years ago that anyone proposing that shit would have been locked into a padded cell - for their own protection.

Expand full comment

I managed to take the wife and kids and leave California forever. It’s not ethical to live there, especially if you have children. It’s like consciously choosing to live in a country with legalized pedophilia or slavery or something. It doesn’t matter if you don’t do the evil acts yourself, you are still guilty because you choose to live there.

Expand full comment