I know what would work to reduce vaccine “misinformation.” A vaccine that was actually safe and effective, and, as a result, people who took it no longer became infected, and did not suffer injuries or death.
Recently my daughter took my ten-year-old grandson to the pediatrician for a well-child checkup. When she again refused the Covid shot as well as a flu shot for her son, the doctor sighed and said "I don't know what to do with 'you people.' I used to be a doctor. Now I'm just a consultant." As an unrepentant optimist, I'm believing this is already backfiring. The strong arm of the government and the holier-than-thou attitude of medical personnel has become tiresome and maddening. The eventual result may be a collective push from the uncooperative for medical independence. We are already seeing general vaccine resistance and the cumulative frustration of subjection to censorship and government mind warps. "We people" are smarter than these manipulators think out here in reality land.
Last year during a doctor's visit, they inserted a needle into a sensitive place. While fiddling with a needle the MD started pestering me about not being vaccinated.
Car salesmen would be proud of that kind of tactic.
This is actually pretty great. It will make it a lot easier to compare long term health outcomes of vaccinated vs unvaccinated in the CMS data. If their intent is to demonstrate the opposite, this effort will backfire spectacularly (not that we'll hear about it without some whistleblower type action)
More people need to ask themselves the question, WHY are they so desperate to get this particular injection into every person on the earth--DESPITE the limited risk of the virus, the lack of durable protection from the shot, its failure to stop the spread of anything, and its well-documented dangers and harms to so many. WHAT is all of this REALLY about?
It’s called tyranny. America was founded by independent and self-reliant citizens who sought to limit the government’s role in their lives. The point is to squeeze any remaining independence and self-reliance out of the American psyche and replace it with blind obedience to authority.
While the last 3 years seem to have been about many different agendas - what I like to call a 'deep event,' I am more and more of the mind that it was primarily about the jab - getting those into every willing arm in as many age groups and as many times as possible. They seem to need the mRNA platform to succeed after a decade-plus of failure, and pushed an experiment on as much of humanity as they could using all the tricks they could muster - threats, coercion, social shaming, etc. The question is: Why? Why push such a poor and untested product on the public and make plans for its permanent addition to our lives - even now, in the face of overwhelming evidence that it's doing more harm than good?
On the mRNA platform specifically, I think they like it because it provides a lot of flexibility. As to why they're more concerned about compliance than risk benefit, I did write a short article on that topic because it comes up a lot https://radicalamerican.substack.com/p/the-system-consensus
Define "globohomo" and I'll take another pass at your article. You describe it as akin to: managerial class, scientific-technocratic elite, loyal subjects of the Globalist American Empire, but you do not explain how you came to attach "homo" to "globo" to form the word.
If "homo" here refers to homogeneous, and not homosexual in a negative context that some commentators seem wont to attach to a lot these days, I'd take another pass at it.
Yes, I do specify that in my usage homo refers to homogeneous in another article on this topic (https://radicalamerican.substack.com/p/america-isnt-gae). I won't go into a long explanation of my views on sexuality and society, but as a proxy indicator of my general position I was in favor of the repeal of DADT.
ICD codes are used to identify illness and disease, obviously choosing not to take an experimental drug is neither. More significantly the federal government would like to take over health care. HIPAA was suppose to protect patient information but really it's just given the government greater access to it. Adding a code for the unvaccinated is a quick easy way to identify anyone that chose not to comply with the government "recommendation" to take the shot.
I assume this coding could enable the "public health authorities" to compile a list of unvaccinated people. Why might they want to do that? Why does the government have an interest in making a registry of all gun owners? Do you suppose it is just out of curiosity?
This will enable them to make a list of all unvaccinated people in the country (at least those who have had doctor appointments). I cannot help thinking of the federal government's interest in making a "registry" of all gun owners and the warnings that 2nd amendment defenders have made against doing so.
the EUA injectables are a DOD ‘prototype/ countermeasure’ not a pharmaceutical product, not subject to the legitimate testing/trials required for a pharmaceutical product.
"That would work, right? If your child’s pediatrician walked into the exam room and said, “We’re going to do some shots today,”" Don't underestimate how powerful stuff like this can be. This sets it up as though the descriptive norm is to get the vaccine and requires the patient to be confrontational with the doctor if they happen to not want vaccines. This is really messed up that this is considered ethical. What happened to evidence based medicine? What happened to respecting patient values? I should note that this is a great way of getting compliance, but not buy-in. You can coerce people successfully, but they won't necessarily keep putting themselves in such an environment willingly. Expect there to be a trend in parents not taking their children in for well-baby exams and annual checkups the same way they're transitioning to home schooling in record numbers. I've had to deal with this personally with two young children. It really does come across like the only thing pediatricians care about is the vaccines, everything else is just a formality. I'm not sure about the risk benefit for most vaccines, but I do know for children covid vaccines simply can't be supported by any stretch. These pediatricians typically recommend covid vaccines for children as well. Why bother going to a doctor with such terrible clinical reasoning?
I guess my main question is Why? The answer cannot be so innocent to be “public health”, so everyone gets the jab, can it? Is it Big Pharma in control? Too much money to spend? Implant microchips?
As has been the case in the past, once the objective is reached the fascists will eliminate all these professionals that facilitated the event, which, corresponds with lowering the population.
Callous your mind up, it only gets worse from here.
If so, it's not really about the environment. Global warming is just a pretext.
In the longer term, people who study these things predict that by 2030, AI and robots will make 45-50% of jobs obsolete. There's not really enough money for a universal basic income for half of humanity at present numbers (governments can't even make good on the pension-commitments they've already made), and the tax base will be much reduced when 50% of citizens are permanently, structurally unemployed. (Read the book _The Artificial Intelligence Contagion_ by Barnhizer & Barnhizer.) They fear mass unrest will be the result and are trying to get out in front of that threat.
In the shorter term, the powers-that-be know that the banking and finance system is on the verge of collapse and many people could lose nearly everything. The digital IDs (a.k.a., "vaccine passport" QR codes), lockdowns, ubiquitous surveillance, etc., can also be used to tamp down on the resulting social unrest here too.
Not enough humans to siphon the surplus from, not enough resources for them to enslave whoever is left, to run the machines, those who have gone rouge will reduce the elites population.
This will all go gradually worse because people think the enemy can be as nasty as it likes but we must respond in a civil, responsible, and peaceful way. When you stop being such dumb fuckers and get out there and fight, then we will have a shot at establishing a genuine egalitarian democratic meritocracy.
So where are we on clot shot uptake nowadays? Does anyone have the numbers?
I'm at the point where no needles go into my arm or anywhere else. I don't trust the medical establishment much nowadays. And I have to say, I've been skeptical of vaccines for the past 45 years. Maybe it can be attributed to laziness for most of that time, but since the plandemic, it's fear of being deliberately injured.
The mind-blowing irony of wishing to identify misinformation (SIC) with a "high potential for impacting vaccine confidence" by the very people who completely gutted "vaccine confidence" in their zeal to protect and mandate an obvious failure so bad they had to redefine "vaccine"...
Chris writes about the “presumptive approach to vaccination counseling”:
“That would work, right? If your child’s pediatrician walked into the exam room and said, ‘We’re going to do some shots today,’ instead of asking, you would just hold up your child’s arm and passively submit, because the presumption of cooperation would render you helpless. It’s science.”
I’m not sure of the exact scope of sarcasm Chris intends here, but my reaction wasn’t so much that it won’t be effective (to use one of the words of the decade), but that beneath a thin academic and bureaucratic veneer, they’re saying medical care should henceforth be the equivalent of a cop rolling up to a suspect, drawing his weapon, and shouting, “Put your f-ing hands in the air!” – albeit spoken at lower volume and with the profanity held in reserve.
I think such an approach by government, doctors, and other authority figures will certainly get plenty of compliance (along with engendering some resistance, of course). And that seems to be all they want.
P.S. Leave it to the federal government to take all the fun out of hearing, “We have to do some shots.”
Why is all this funding going specifically towards VACCINE misinformation? Are there new vaccines in the pipeline that will need to be propagandized? How many? I’m also concerned by the reference to pregnant women with regard to vaccines-- it seems like the established precept of not giving new drugs to pregnant women has been permanently discarded? (I’m also shocked they used the sexist term “pregnant women” instead of “pregnant people”! How regressive.)
The answer is “yes” Moderna has a long list of MRNA vaccines and treatments in their pipeline. Full speed ahead!! The “pandemic” accelerated the technology and was a boon to their projects. Wow, how fortuitous!! Could not have come at a better time for them.
When the government allocated $1B to media outlets, i.e. bribing media outlets, to promote the "safe and effective" mantra, imagine what a whole-of-government effort involved/cost! By the same token, we also had a whole-of-government approach to getting out the vote for the 2020 midterms and look how that worked out...
‘“We’re going to do some shots today,” instead of asking’ what Scott Adams describes as ‘thinking passed the sale’. A sales/persuasion technique to be always on your guard for. Fortunately being a bit of a contrarian I have some innate immunity if not complete.
I know what would work to reduce vaccine “misinformation.” A vaccine that was actually safe and effective, and, as a result, people who took it no longer became infected, and did not suffer injuries or death.
Or destroy them. as well as treasonous state medical boards. And let doctors be doctors
Recently my daughter took my ten-year-old grandson to the pediatrician for a well-child checkup. When she again refused the Covid shot as well as a flu shot for her son, the doctor sighed and said "I don't know what to do with 'you people.' I used to be a doctor. Now I'm just a consultant." As an unrepentant optimist, I'm believing this is already backfiring. The strong arm of the government and the holier-than-thou attitude of medical personnel has become tiresome and maddening. The eventual result may be a collective push from the uncooperative for medical independence. We are already seeing general vaccine resistance and the cumulative frustration of subjection to censorship and government mind warps. "We people" are smarter than these manipulators think out here in reality land.
They've sacrificed long term commitment for short term compliance.
And sacrificed "Do No Harm" for "Make Money Regardless"
Last year during a doctor's visit, they inserted a needle into a sensitive place. While fiddling with a needle the MD started pestering me about not being vaccinated.
Car salesmen would be proud of that kind of tactic.
Despicable.
"That shot is a lemon!" LOL
I would have said to this doctor, "There there" (patting his arm), "Consultants have a certain status, too,"
Good for your daughter. Small acts of resistance...
"I used to be a doctor. Now I'm just a consultant."
That's a pretty telling comment.
Yes, those of us who can express ourselves can lend expression to others. Make thoughtful, intelligent arguments. Invite agreement: "what she said..."
HHS CMS coding the unclean:
https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/unvaccinated-for-covid-19-coded-as-icd-19-z28.310a-252548d6
Fuckers!
...of maternal beings.
This is actually pretty great. It will make it a lot easier to compare long term health outcomes of vaccinated vs unvaccinated in the CMS data. If their intent is to demonstrate the opposite, this effort will backfire spectacularly (not that we'll hear about it without some whistleblower type action)
More people need to ask themselves the question, WHY are they so desperate to get this particular injection into every person on the earth--DESPITE the limited risk of the virus, the lack of durable protection from the shot, its failure to stop the spread of anything, and its well-documented dangers and harms to so many. WHAT is all of this REALLY about?
It’s called tyranny. America was founded by independent and self-reliant citizens who sought to limit the government’s role in their lives. The point is to squeeze any remaining independence and self-reliance out of the American psyche and replace it with blind obedience to authority.
...and DEATH.
It's a cull, that's pretty clear.
They can't handle what it's really about... Genocide? People can't believe it.
think the ratings stay low until the story gets translated into a slick Netflix production.
But we ARE growing a whole new journalism, outside the "MSM." So perhaps we're only "stuck" with things until we realize we actually do have options.
While the last 3 years seem to have been about many different agendas - what I like to call a 'deep event,' I am more and more of the mind that it was primarily about the jab - getting those into every willing arm in as many age groups and as many times as possible. They seem to need the mRNA platform to succeed after a decade-plus of failure, and pushed an experiment on as much of humanity as they could using all the tricks they could muster - threats, coercion, social shaming, etc. The question is: Why? Why push such a poor and untested product on the public and make plans for its permanent addition to our lives - even now, in the face of overwhelming evidence that it's doing more harm than good?
On the mRNA platform specifically, I think they like it because it provides a lot of flexibility. As to why they're more concerned about compliance than risk benefit, I did write a short article on that topic because it comes up a lot https://radicalamerican.substack.com/p/the-system-consensus
Define "globohomo" and I'll take another pass at your article. You describe it as akin to: managerial class, scientific-technocratic elite, loyal subjects of the Globalist American Empire, but you do not explain how you came to attach "homo" to "globo" to form the word.
If "homo" here refers to homogeneous, and not homosexual in a negative context that some commentators seem wont to attach to a lot these days, I'd take another pass at it.
Yes, I do specify that in my usage homo refers to homogeneous in another article on this topic (https://radicalamerican.substack.com/p/america-isnt-gae). I won't go into a long explanation of my views on sexuality and society, but as a proxy indicator of my general position I was in favor of the repeal of DADT.
What is the significance of that?
ICD codes are used to identify illness and disease, obviously choosing not to take an experimental drug is neither. More significantly the federal government would like to take over health care. HIPAA was suppose to protect patient information but really it's just given the government greater access to it. Adding a code for the unvaccinated is a quick easy way to identify anyone that chose not to comply with the government "recommendation" to take the shot.
What Chris said!
Thanks
I assume this coding could enable the "public health authorities" to compile a list of unvaccinated people. Why might they want to do that? Why does the government have an interest in making a registry of all gun owners? Do you suppose it is just out of curiosity?
They need these things! To give to those 85,000 new ARMED IRS agents...
re: medical code for the unvaccinated:
This will enable them to make a list of all unvaccinated people in the country (at least those who have had doctor appointments). I cannot help thinking of the federal government's interest in making a "registry" of all gun owners and the warnings that 2nd amendment defenders have made against doing so.
the EUA injectables are a DOD ‘prototype/ countermeasure’ not a pharmaceutical product, not subject to the legitimate testing/trials required for a pharmaceutical product.
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/intent-to-harm
For more on the legal infrastructure enabling all this, see Katherine Watt's Bailiwick News.
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/legal-walls-of-the-covid-19-kill?s=w
yes, this is a fantastic resource!
Geez.
"That would work, right? If your child’s pediatrician walked into the exam room and said, “We’re going to do some shots today,”" Don't underestimate how powerful stuff like this can be. This sets it up as though the descriptive norm is to get the vaccine and requires the patient to be confrontational with the doctor if they happen to not want vaccines. This is really messed up that this is considered ethical. What happened to evidence based medicine? What happened to respecting patient values? I should note that this is a great way of getting compliance, but not buy-in. You can coerce people successfully, but they won't necessarily keep putting themselves in such an environment willingly. Expect there to be a trend in parents not taking their children in for well-baby exams and annual checkups the same way they're transitioning to home schooling in record numbers. I've had to deal with this personally with two young children. It really does come across like the only thing pediatricians care about is the vaccines, everything else is just a formality. I'm not sure about the risk benefit for most vaccines, but I do know for children covid vaccines simply can't be supported by any stretch. These pediatricians typically recommend covid vaccines for children as well. Why bother going to a doctor with such terrible clinical reasoning?
I guess my main question is Why? The answer cannot be so innocent to be “public health”, so everyone gets the jab, can it? Is it Big Pharma in control? Too much money to spend? Implant microchips?
Lowering the human population is my view.
As has been the case in the past, once the objective is reached the fascists will eliminate all these professionals that facilitated the event, which, corresponds with lowering the population.
Callous your mind up, it only gets worse from here.
If so, it's not really about the environment. Global warming is just a pretext.
In the longer term, people who study these things predict that by 2030, AI and robots will make 45-50% of jobs obsolete. There's not really enough money for a universal basic income for half of humanity at present numbers (governments can't even make good on the pension-commitments they've already made), and the tax base will be much reduced when 50% of citizens are permanently, structurally unemployed. (Read the book _The Artificial Intelligence Contagion_ by Barnhizer & Barnhizer.) They fear mass unrest will be the result and are trying to get out in front of that threat.
In the shorter term, the powers-that-be know that the banking and finance system is on the verge of collapse and many people could lose nearly everything. The digital IDs (a.k.a., "vaccine passport" QR codes), lockdowns, ubiquitous surveillance, etc., can also be used to tamp down on the resulting social unrest here too.
Plug into the WEF YouTube Channel.
Georgia Guidestones with slavery for survivors. 500m
Not enough humans to siphon the surplus from, not enough resources for them to enslave whoever is left, to run the machines, those who have gone rouge will reduce the elites population.
"April 15 is when you pay people to try to shit inside your brain."
This. Is. Perfect.
This will all go gradually worse because people think the enemy can be as nasty as it likes but we must respond in a civil, responsible, and peaceful way. When you stop being such dumb fuckers and get out there and fight, then we will have a shot at establishing a genuine egalitarian democratic meritocracy.
Great Catholic Monarch will be killing a lot of commies. He won't be nice
https://archive.org/details/CatholicProphecy
They're not even pretending anymore... With every day that goes by I'm more convinced that this is going to go very badly for humanity for a while.
And yet so many are so completely unaware about what's going on.
So where are we on clot shot uptake nowadays? Does anyone have the numbers?
I'm at the point where no needles go into my arm or anywhere else. I don't trust the medical establishment much nowadays. And I have to say, I've been skeptical of vaccines for the past 45 years. Maybe it can be attributed to laziness for most of that time, but since the plandemic, it's fear of being deliberately injured.
The mind-blowing irony of wishing to identify misinformation (SIC) with a "high potential for impacting vaccine confidence" by the very people who completely gutted "vaccine confidence" in their zeal to protect and mandate an obvious failure so bad they had to redefine "vaccine"...
My head is about to explode from too much recursion.
Chris writes about the “presumptive approach to vaccination counseling”:
“That would work, right? If your child’s pediatrician walked into the exam room and said, ‘We’re going to do some shots today,’ instead of asking, you would just hold up your child’s arm and passively submit, because the presumption of cooperation would render you helpless. It’s science.”
I’m not sure of the exact scope of sarcasm Chris intends here, but my reaction wasn’t so much that it won’t be effective (to use one of the words of the decade), but that beneath a thin academic and bureaucratic veneer, they’re saying medical care should henceforth be the equivalent of a cop rolling up to a suspect, drawing his weapon, and shouting, “Put your f-ing hands in the air!” – albeit spoken at lower volume and with the profanity held in reserve.
I think such an approach by government, doctors, and other authority figures will certainly get plenty of compliance (along with engendering some resistance, of course). And that seems to be all they want.
P.S. Leave it to the federal government to take all the fun out of hearing, “We have to do some shots.”
LOL@ your PS. ;-)
Another top shelf essay that rips the curtain from the “machine.”
Why is all this funding going specifically towards VACCINE misinformation? Are there new vaccines in the pipeline that will need to be propagandized? How many? I’m also concerned by the reference to pregnant women with regard to vaccines-- it seems like the established precept of not giving new drugs to pregnant women has been permanently discarded? (I’m also shocked they used the sexist term “pregnant women” instead of “pregnant people”! How regressive.)
The answer is “yes” Moderna has a long list of MRNA vaccines and treatments in their pipeline. Full speed ahead!! The “pandemic” accelerated the technology and was a boon to their projects. Wow, how fortuitous!! Could not have come at a better time for them.
“To decrease misinformation about vaccines.”
Err...if there was nothing wrong with the "vaccines" and if they actually worked, you wouldn't need to do this.
This.
When the government allocated $1B to media outlets, i.e. bribing media outlets, to promote the "safe and effective" mantra, imagine what a whole-of-government effort involved/cost! By the same token, we also had a whole-of-government approach to getting out the vote for the 2020 midterms and look how that worked out...
https://www.theblaze.com/news/review-the-federal-government-paid-media-companies-to-advertise-for-the-vaccines
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/03/07/executive-order-on-promoting-access-to-voting/
‘“We’re going to do some shots today,” instead of asking’ what Scott Adams describes as ‘thinking passed the sale’. A sales/persuasion technique to be always on your guard for. Fortunately being a bit of a contrarian I have some innate immunity if not complete.