The Weatherman: Some Brief Thoughts
Many news organizations reporting now that Charlie Kirk has died. I hope they’re wrong, but I doubt it. Three quick and early thoughts:
First, the murder of Charlie Kirk is just the next level up the behavioral chain from the way Robert F. Kennedy was just treated in front of a Senate committee. He wasn’t mistaken, or wrong: He was an unforgivable monster, wholly illegitimate in every imaginable sense, who had no views or arguments that were worth considering in any way, and the only possible response to him is personal destruction. Our institutional left is a rage mob with formal titles. We’re not having a debate.
Second, the transition to radical violence is a reflection of the events that followed the death of the radical dream of the 1960s New Left. After the hippies, the Weatherman and the Symbionese Liberation Army. The turn to radical violence is the turn that follows obvious failure. It’s an acknowledgement of political impotence, and a last-ditch emergency reflex: If they won’t submit to our political vision, we’ll coerce them into submission. It’s the death rattle. It means the arguing and convincing has failed, and they see the failure.
Third, Camille Paglia persistently describes late-cultural-stage sexual disorder, especially widespread transgenderism, as a turn to sadomasochism, and I didn’t get that description for a long time. I’m seeing it now. It comes from an impotent rage over the limits of personal will, a Veruca Salt disgust that the world doesn’t do what I want, and a desire to hurt the body that’s trapped by a nature that won’t yield to ideology. I’m going to dive back into Sexual Personae today. Notice how much left-oriented political identities are currently invested in causing literal, physical injury, and in celebrating moments in which political opponents suffer actual pain. Go look for leftists celebrating Charlie Kirk’s death on social media, if you want to wade into that sewer. “Progressive” politics is becoming a torture fetish.
I know this message will seem strange in this moment, but the violent lashing out isn’t a sign of strength. It’s the sign of cultural death, and evidence that the people who want to destroy disagreement are deeply, painfully aware that they cannot convince.
There will be more infliction of pain as they face that collapse.

"Charlie Kirk shot hell yes."
https://x.com/choeshow/status/1965876647485391345/photo/1
When people cheer the death of a man like Charlie Kirk, the middle ground is gone. Kirk was a pragmatic, calm, knowledgeable debater. He allowed his opponents to speak uninterrupted, he was often yelled at, and even laughed at, he never lost his cool. He simply debated the issue and presented his side. He would allow anyone to challenge him. His assasination had 1 purpose, to shut conservatives up, full stop. The shot was 200 yards and a precision kill shot, not some novice shooter. These people are out for blood and they want all opposing voices silenced, stat.