It is funny: the dominant talk from Bulwark-type pundits seems to have been that Trump was leading the GOP into a permanent wilderness, and McConnell, Ryan, McCain, etc., knew it but were unable to save the party from itself.
But looking at it now, isn't it more like Obama was leading the Democrats into the wilderness?
To be fair, the Bulwark (apex) social parasites had spent years/decades perfecting their blood and puss sucking methods publishing justifications for the crimes of the Deep State and the neocon war machine. Pivoting away from that quickly would have been a monumental demonstration of the human capacity to transcend corruption and evil.
Mr. Bray. I regret to inform you.I will be sending you a bill for a replacement bullshit meter, when I read your line that the Democrats won't tolerate a new tax My trusted Bovine excretement detector quite literally exploded. There are currently three fire trucks and two helicopters trying to put the flames out. I'll keep you updated as we get the situation under control
More brilliant analysis. The smugness of those people belongs in a Molière comedy, and now even CNN's Van Jones (who actually gets points for bravely "facing up to defeat") can't see beyond the podcasts and other alternative media that Trump used and Harris didn't.
As difficult as it is for normal people like us to understand, a lot of this apparent insanity is about the money. For instance, they don't call the Frankenstein-like surgical mutilation of CHILDREN and the mentally ill "The Transgender Industrial Complex" for nothing. This stuff is extremely lucrative. The hormones, the surgery, the medical care for life; there's A LOT, A LOT, A LOT of money in it for those who can manage to push themselves past the horrors.
You're absolutely right to ask that question; I've asked it myself upon hearing the "follow the money" cliche.
Maybe because in addition to the "good money," these "health workers" are also evil subhumans who get a major buzz from torturing children (and others) when they themselves know they deserve to be criminally prosecuted? And that many who do this are themselves "transgender" and their heart's desire is to add more freaks to the club? That they are also people who really enjoy undermining civilized society? Also there's this: No private practice or enterprise can compete with the gushing faucet of government money we have been seeing here ---- as opposed to maybe not getting paid by one's plastic surgery patient or a patient's insurance company from legitimate surgery?
Pointing out this stuff is a big money-maker is only to say that the transgender horror show is not just about ideology, nor is it merely a matter of "gender-affirmation" or a defense of "transgender rights." As you know...
Here is some esoteric memetic analysis of the social media attention problem from back in the day, after the 2016 election.
excerpt:
In the context of the Communications Infrastructure, the goal of the insurgent Red Religion CI was to achieve the election of Donald Trump by amplifying supportive messages, memes and signal while running interference and amplifying noise on Hillary messaging. The incentive for participation was the glory of receiving attention. Different tasks had different structures: creation and idea generation was distributed with distant edges; not even demonstrated allegiance was necessary; deciding which messages were amplified was carried out in a decentralised way, working through a hierarchy of those who command more attention.
medium .com /rally-point-journal/collective-intellignce-and-swarms-in-the-red-church-49f6a6d04825
[Jordan Hall's situational reports: the concept of the failing Blue Church and memetics]
---
excerpt:
... the Blue Church is a kind of narrative / ideology control structure that is a natural result of mass media. It is an evolved (rather than designed) function that has come over the past half-century to be deeply connected with the Democratic political “Establishment” and lightly connected with the “Deep State” to form an effective political and dominant cultural force in the United States.
We can trace its roots at least as far back as the beginning of the 20th Century where it emerged in response to the new capabilities of mass media for social control. By mid-century it began to play an increasingly meaningful role in forming and shaping American culture-producing institutions; became pervasive through the last half of the 20th and seems to have peaked in its influence somewhere in the first decade of the 21st Century.
It is now beginning to unravel.
In part it is unravelling because of developing schisms within its master narrative, the Blue Faith. These are important, but they are not the subject of this essay. In this essay, I am focusing on what I think is both much more fundamental and much less obvious: deep shifts in technology and society that are undermining the very foundations of the Church. Shifts that render the Church itself obsolete.
Summary: from the perspective of systems theory and evolutionary psychology, socially pathological leftism (what New Age philosopher Ken Wilber calls the "mean green meme") is doomed to eventual extinction, more or less.
Daniel Penny??? He put a choke hold on a cowardly, convicted homeless lunatic and Michael Jackson impersonator that violently assaulted one or more old ladies. And was put back on the street by the almost equally insane leftists in NYC’s court system and DA’s office. The impersonator had a warrant for his arrest for violating parole on a previous conviction and illegally leaving a drug treatment program.
“Woke” leftists allowed a blood thirsty, violent, insane criminal roam the streets.
The impersonator was still alive when the cops showed up. No one wanted to do mouth-to-mouth resuscitation due to the possibility of contagious disease. Impersonator had defecated in his pants.
I had a mindless troll/bot in some Bulwark (Bullsch1dt) comment section ask for “proof” that the Biden Crime Family had actually committed a crime. I cited several sources documenting Biden’s attempts at destroying free speech, such as 5he #twitterfiles .
The response from the mindless Bulwark troll/bot: no crime happened unless there was a “conviction”.
The troll also regaled with the bit of wisdom that the Burisma scandal (which the troll had not noticed previously) and Hunter’s laptop didn’t expose anything criminal.
Bulwark is obviously a corrupt front for extremely stupid, sociopathic, war mongering neocons that can’t stand populism.
They are, with the elite-left woke cargo cult, the last, pathetic remnant of the medieval intellectual elites that preferred the peasants to remain poor, starving, illiterate and diseased to preserve their “earthy” spiritual purity and that loathed the impure, “crass commercialism” of the expanding, literate urban commoner classes (bourgeoisie, middle class merchants, shopkeepers, scribes, etc.)
I remember coming across that logic before. It's not a crime unless convicted - hence you're not allowed to investigate anybody until they've been convicted. I could never figure out if their goal was just an end to police or the institution of show trial.
(p.s. I enjoy your work, John A. Lucas - am a follower. Keep writing!)
My guess is that most of this kind of woke nonsense is posted on social media by AI b0tz (funded by soros types), but there are few actual deranged lunatics, real biological humans, that also do so.
There is a real biological human that is a raging lunatic named Teidrich or something like that that appears to be a main source of that kind of mental sewage. His insane x/twschitter posts appear to be copied widely by the "left" on social media, various platforms.
“…no crime happened unless there was a “conviction”. “
Lately, that statement always seems to come in reference to Trump‘s “34 felonies”. The irony is that the very people who are citing Trump‘s conviction as a “automatic truth“ are the same people who have alleged, for decades, that the criminal justice system falsely convicts minorities as a matter of routine. So, if one “class of persons“ is routinely wrongly convicted because of lawfare, how can it be beyond their imagination that someone else might also be the victim of unjust convictions?
The DEI/woke cargo cult zombies are mentally dysfunctional* lunatics that are incapable of rationally processing or comprehending objective facts or logic that contradicts their toxic confirmation biases and emotive-subjective hate/victim narratives. They are led by corrupt people that gain money and/or power and status from perpetuating the insanity.
There is a whole body of commentary related to evolutionary psychology and systems theory that explains how such social parasites flourish in a disintegrating societies when their "sense making" capacities lack anti-fragility to disruption.
See John Vervaeke and Iain McGilchrist for starters.
The conclusion is that further cultural evolution is required to build anti-fragility to disruption. (Jim Rutt of Santa Fe Institute ran an experiment called Game-B that was a successful proof of concept.)
Not only does everyone have personal experience with how difficult it can be to change people's minds, but there's also empirical research showing why this is the case. A new study in Current Biology explains why some people seem to be constitutionally incapable of admitting they're wrong. The study shows the underlying mechanism behind being bull-headed, and there may be some ways to get better at recognizing when you're wrong.
...
cont. excerpts
New research published in Current Biology on December 18, 2018, confirms this feeling: people with radical beliefs actually think differently than those without. Specifically, radicals have less metacognitive sensitivity than moderates.
Metacognition refers to the ability to be aware of and analyze one’s own thinking. Metacognitive sensitivity is similar, but more specific: it refers to the ability to distinguish between one’s correct and incorrect judgements. The new paper, titled “Metacognitive Failure as a Feature of Holding Radical Beliefs,” shows that radicals have measurably less metacognitive sensitivity than moderates.
We need to get the law changed back, making it illegal again to propagandize Americans. That will level the playing field. These people live in their own bubble joyfully unaware of what is really happening, unencumbered by facts. Sgt. Friday said it best- Just the facts, ma’am.
Please let them be dead. 💀. And yet , I understand that whoever that woman’s is on the view has had to read 4 legal retractions and yet , i know people who still watch. Help me out here. Please. On both sides …. The view ladies knowingly go on daily and get it wrong , 😑 they and the watching ladies ( I’m stereotyping , I know ) turn the crap on daily even though they are feeding me bullshit.
Maybe the only people who watch are the people that want to make fun of how stupid they are? Wouldn’t that be awesome.
That initial letter kind of spells it out though. The point is to get free transition-treatments, nothing else.
And repeating myself: This is not the time to ease off the trigger. This is the time to increase the intensity of the attack against al things liberal, woke and progressive. To use the tired WW2-metaphor:
Imagine if the Germans had been allowed to retreat in good order instead of being caught in the Falaise-trap.
Everyone wants to be special, even unique. Genders and sexualities multiply like bacteria in a festering sore—and speaking of David French, if he wants to identify as a conservative for Harris, he might as well also identify as a gender fluid pansexual. It sounds messy, but no more so than the bile he excretes on the page.
The self-obsessed 'monologue' by the founder of Bulwark demonstrates everything you need to know about this political movement -- they are pathologically imprisoned inside their own heads. Kelly Ann Conway could not have looked more bored, but at one point I thought she was going to burst out in pure unadulterated laughter, the kind you can't stop.
It is funny: the dominant talk from Bulwark-type pundits seems to have been that Trump was leading the GOP into a permanent wilderness, and McConnell, Ryan, McCain, etc., knew it but were unable to save the party from itself.
But looking at it now, isn't it more like Obama was leading the Democrats into the wilderness?
Exactly.
like
To be fair, the Bulwark (apex) social parasites had spent years/decades perfecting their blood and puss sucking methods publishing justifications for the crimes of the Deep State and the neocon war machine. Pivoting away from that quickly would have been a monumental demonstration of the human capacity to transcend corruption and evil.
They’ve jumped the shark. They just haven’t realized it yet. They still think they’re leading.
Notice the fact-checkers are back at work after sleepwalking through the last four years?
Speaking of things to bury and forget....
TARIFFS ARE TAXES AND TAXES ARE BAD AGAIN
If there's one thing a Democrat won't tolerate, it's a new tax
Mr. Bray. I regret to inform you.I will be sending you a bill for a replacement bullshit meter, when I read your line that the Democrats won't tolerate a new tax My trusted Bovine excretement detector quite literally exploded. There are currently three fire trucks and two helicopters trying to put the flames out. I'll keep you updated as we get the situation under control
Rumor has it that Bill Gates is developing a new AI driven model using nuclear power. Start a GoFundMe now to cover the cost!
Does one have to put sarc after or before a comment that is so obviously sarcasm? Asking for a friend.
lol
😂🤣😂🤣
"They live in a world of stranded symbols"
More brilliant analysis. The smugness of those people belongs in a Molière comedy, and now even CNN's Van Jones (who actually gets points for bravely "facing up to defeat") can't see beyond the podcasts and other alternative media that Trump used and Harris didn't.
They can't figure out that just sitting down and talking to people is more popular than always lying to the audience and treating them like idiots.
Good for us here in Substack land.
But “Talking to people” might include the “non college, working class.” (Including the guy who delivers your $100 hair gel, overnight…) The hubris.
Hence the need for safe spaces!
As difficult as it is for normal people like us to understand, a lot of this apparent insanity is about the money. For instance, they don't call the Frankenstein-like surgical mutilation of CHILDREN and the mentally ill "The Transgender Industrial Complex" for nothing. This stuff is extremely lucrative. The hormones, the surgery, the medical care for life; there's A LOT, A LOT, A LOT of money in it for those who can manage to push themselves past the horrors.
Why couldn't they have restricted themselves to the entirely legal, and profitable, field of cosmetic surgery?
You're absolutely right to ask that question; I've asked it myself upon hearing the "follow the money" cliche.
Maybe because in addition to the "good money," these "health workers" are also evil subhumans who get a major buzz from torturing children (and others) when they themselves know they deserve to be criminally prosecuted? And that many who do this are themselves "transgender" and their heart's desire is to add more freaks to the club? That they are also people who really enjoy undermining civilized society? Also there's this: No private practice or enterprise can compete with the gushing faucet of government money we have been seeing here ---- as opposed to maybe not getting paid by one's plastic surgery patient or a patient's insurance company from legitimate surgery?
Pointing out this stuff is a big money-maker is only to say that the transgender horror show is not just about ideology, nor is it merely a matter of "gender-affirmation" or a defense of "transgender rights." As you know...
*** jargon warning ***
Here is some esoteric memetic analysis of the social media attention problem from back in the day, after the 2016 election.
excerpt:
In the context of the Communications Infrastructure, the goal of the insurgent Red Religion CI was to achieve the election of Donald Trump by amplifying supportive messages, memes and signal while running interference and amplifying noise on Hillary messaging. The incentive for participation was the glory of receiving attention. Different tasks had different structures: creation and idea generation was distributed with distant edges; not even demonstrated allegiance was necessary; deciding which messages were amplified was carried out in a decentralised way, working through a hierarchy of those who command more attention.
...
https://medium.com/rally-point-journal/collective-intellignce-and-swarms-in-the-red-church-49f6a6d04825
medium .com /rally-point-journal/collective-intellignce-and-swarms-in-the-red-church-49f6a6d04825
[Jordan Hall's situational reports: the concept of the failing Blue Church and memetics]
---
excerpt:
... the Blue Church is a kind of narrative / ideology control structure that is a natural result of mass media. It is an evolved (rather than designed) function that has come over the past half-century to be deeply connected with the Democratic political “Establishment” and lightly connected with the “Deep State” to form an effective political and dominant cultural force in the United States.
We can trace its roots at least as far back as the beginning of the 20th Century where it emerged in response to the new capabilities of mass media for social control. By mid-century it began to play an increasingly meaningful role in forming and shaping American culture-producing institutions; became pervasive through the last half of the 20th and seems to have peaked in its influence somewhere in the first decade of the 21st Century.
It is now beginning to unravel.
In part it is unravelling because of developing schisms within its master narrative, the Blue Faith. These are important, but they are not the subject of this essay. In this essay, I am focusing on what I think is both much more fundamental and much less obvious: deep shifts in technology and society that are undermining the very foundations of the Church. Shifts that render the Church itself obsolete.
https://medium.com/deep-code/understanding-the-blue-church-e4781b2bd9b5
medium. com /deep-code/understanding-the-blue-church-e4781b2bd9b5
Summary: from the perspective of systems theory and evolutionary psychology, socially pathological leftism (what New Age philosopher Ken Wilber calls the "mean green meme") is doomed to eventual extinction, more or less.
Daniel Penny??? He put a choke hold on a cowardly, convicted homeless lunatic and Michael Jackson impersonator that violently assaulted one or more old ladies. And was put back on the street by the almost equally insane leftists in NYC’s court system and DA’s office. The impersonator had a warrant for his arrest for violating parole on a previous conviction and illegally leaving a drug treatment program.
“Woke” leftists allowed a blood thirsty, violent, insane criminal roam the streets.
The impersonator was still alive when the cops showed up. No one wanted to do mouth-to-mouth resuscitation due to the possibility of contagious disease. Impersonator had defecated in his pants.
Out of human compassion you really wish you could help them, but this is a mental illness with no known cure.
“I said I sure hope my little boy is getting his vagina sewed in right now, sergeant!”
"Quisling truck stop prostitutes"!!
this needed a trigger warning for choking from laughter
ouch!
Truck stop prostitutes actually have *some* utility.
"Be, all that you can be.....in the Arrrrmy!"
That’s what makes reading Mr. Bray such an adventure. Start the morning off with a bit of a risk. Lolol.
I keep the coffee at a safe distance till I’m finished reading.
I’m not that wise in the morning…
I had a mindless troll/bot in some Bulwark (Bullsch1dt) comment section ask for “proof” that the Biden Crime Family had actually committed a crime. I cited several sources documenting Biden’s attempts at destroying free speech, such as 5he #twitterfiles .
The response from the mindless Bulwark troll/bot: no crime happened unless there was a “conviction”.
The troll also regaled with the bit of wisdom that the Burisma scandal (which the troll had not noticed previously) and Hunter’s laptop didn’t expose anything criminal.
Bulwark is obviously a corrupt front for extremely stupid, sociopathic, war mongering neocons that can’t stand populism.
They are, with the elite-left woke cargo cult, the last, pathetic remnant of the medieval intellectual elites that preferred the peasants to remain poor, starving, illiterate and diseased to preserve their “earthy” spiritual purity and that loathed the impure, “crass commercialism” of the expanding, literate urban commoner classes (bourgeoisie, middle class merchants, shopkeepers, scribes, etc.)
Whoever disappeared Jimmy Hoffa committed no crime, donchaknow, because they haven’t been convicted.
I remember coming across that logic before. It's not a crime unless convicted - hence you're not allowed to investigate anybody until they've been convicted. I could never figure out if their goal was just an end to police or the institution of show trial.
(p.s. I enjoy your work, John A. Lucas - am a follower. Keep writing!)
My guess is that most of this kind of woke nonsense is posted on social media by AI b0tz (funded by soros types), but there are few actual deranged lunatics, real biological humans, that also do so.
There is a real biological human that is a raging lunatic named Teidrich or something like that that appears to be a main source of that kind of mental sewage. His insane x/twschitter posts appear to be copied widely by the "left" on social media, various platforms.
Time to take the trash out.
Oh I was seeing some of these tactics decades ago on forums long before LLMs started taking off.
And I know of Tiedrich. You should look up Bob Chipman sometime.
There's a joke among some of us on whether such people are trendsetters or just saying the quiet part out loud.
Thanks for the feedback, Nate.
No body, no crime. Or in the immortal words of Bart Simpson, I didn't do it.Nobody saw me do it.They can't prove nothing.Truly words to live by.
“…no crime happened unless there was a “conviction”. “
Lately, that statement always seems to come in reference to Trump‘s “34 felonies”. The irony is that the very people who are citing Trump‘s conviction as a “automatic truth“ are the same people who have alleged, for decades, that the criminal justice system falsely convicts minorities as a matter of routine. So, if one “class of persons“ is routinely wrongly convicted because of lawfare, how can it be beyond their imagination that someone else might also be the victim of unjust convictions?
Cognitive dissonance is the most essential thing that the leftists require of you.
The DEI/woke cargo cult zombies are mentally dysfunctional* lunatics that are incapable of rationally processing or comprehending objective facts or logic that contradicts their toxic confirmation biases and emotive-subjective hate/victim narratives. They are led by corrupt people that gain money and/or power and status from perpetuating the insanity.
There is a whole body of commentary related to evolutionary psychology and systems theory that explains how such social parasites flourish in a disintegrating societies when their "sense making" capacities lack anti-fragility to disruption.
See John Vervaeke and Iain McGilchrist for starters.
The conclusion is that further cultural evolution is required to build anti-fragility to disruption. (Jim Rutt of Santa Fe Institute ran an experiment called Game-B that was a successful proof of concept.)
---
* https://bigthink.com/neuropsych/radicals-are-worse-at-metacognition/
bigthink.com/neuropsych/radicals-are-worse-at-metacognition/
excerpt:
Neuropsych — February 15, 2019
Why radicals can’t recognize when they’re wrong
Key Takeaways
Not only does everyone have personal experience with how difficult it can be to change people's minds, but there's also empirical research showing why this is the case. A new study in Current Biology explains why some people seem to be constitutionally incapable of admitting they're wrong. The study shows the underlying mechanism behind being bull-headed, and there may be some ways to get better at recognizing when you're wrong.
...
cont. excerpts
New research published in Current Biology on December 18, 2018, confirms this feeling: people with radical beliefs actually think differently than those without. Specifically, radicals have less metacognitive sensitivity than moderates.
Metacognition refers to the ability to be aware of and analyze one’s own thinking. Metacognitive sensitivity is similar, but more specific: it refers to the ability to distinguish between one’s correct and incorrect judgements. The new paper, titled “Metacognitive Failure as a Feature of Holding Radical Beliefs,” shows that radicals have measurably less metacognitive sensitivity than moderates.
[ https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(18)31420-9 ]
We need to get the law changed back, making it illegal again to propagandize Americans. That will level the playing field. These people live in their own bubble joyfully unaware of what is really happening, unencumbered by facts. Sgt. Friday said it best- Just the facts, ma’am.
Thanks for including that photo. MG42s always put me in the Christmas spirit.
"AND A HAPPY NEW YEAR"
Please let them be dead. 💀. And yet , I understand that whoever that woman’s is on the view has had to read 4 legal retractions and yet , i know people who still watch. Help me out here. Please. On both sides …. The view ladies knowingly go on daily and get it wrong , 😑 they and the watching ladies ( I’m stereotyping , I know ) turn the crap on daily even though they are feeding me bullshit.
Maybe the only people who watch are the people that want to make fun of how stupid they are? Wouldn’t that be awesome.
That initial letter kind of spells it out though. The point is to get free transition-treatments, nothing else.
And repeating myself: This is not the time to ease off the trigger. This is the time to increase the intensity of the attack against al things liberal, woke and progressive. To use the tired WW2-metaphor:
Imagine if the Germans had been allowed to retreat in good order instead of being caught in the Falaise-trap.
Everyone wants to be special, even unique. Genders and sexualities multiply like bacteria in a festering sore—and speaking of David French, if he wants to identify as a conservative for Harris, he might as well also identify as a gender fluid pansexual. It sounds messy, but no more so than the bile he excretes on the page.
When "conservative" is applied to both John Kasich and Ted Cruz "conservative" is a meaningless term.
All the markers have been degraded.
They'll hang around, stench and all, as long as there are deranged progressives to finance them.
Look at the fundraising take for the Lincoln Project over time. That grift is trending toward zero.
That's good to hear. I wonder what grift they'll latch on to next, smearing Kamala's gubernatorial rivals? Assuming the rumors are true about the K.
Important feature of those deranged progressives is they work for the ICs.
An interesting thought.
Now that you mention it, at this stage, I have to assume you are right until proven otherwise.
I wonder how many Democrats would be on Epstein's list as opposed to Republicans?
Which would lead to the next question. How many Democrats are pedophiles?
I mean, if a seventy-year-old woman is all for mutilating your children, then how many of the rest believe in it?
My guess, probably the majority. They have no morals or ethics.
Re:
The Bulwark is dead, and all of its idiot sisters. They’re still moving a little bit, but whatever. Throw dirt into their grave and move on.
Glad to see you have turned a corner from being horrified at the state of media to letting it die and move on...
The self-obsessed 'monologue' by the founder of Bulwark demonstrates everything you need to know about this political movement -- they are pathologically imprisoned inside their own heads. Kelly Ann Conway could not have looked more bored, but at one point I thought she was going to burst out in pure unadulterated laughter, the kind you can't stop.
I thought it was remarkably revealing. And the Bulwark posted it -- proudly.
I wish she had…