The Military is Intervening in American Politics
Trump is a fascist, says the military intelligence checkbook
(This is Part Two; see Part One here.)
Follow the money.
I wrote this morning about the disinformation expert Caroline Orr Bueno, a postdoctoral fellow at ARLIS — the Applied Research Laboratory for Intelligence and Security at the University of Maryland (who is identified as Caroline Orr on her ARLIS profile, so that’s the name I’ve used for her). Orr aggressively and repeatedly argues against the American political right, framing conservative politics as fascist and describing Donald Trump as an authoritarian figure. She makes a political argument, and she does it often.
This is true not only of her social media posts, but also of her published work. She’s a pro-Antifa political partisan (more about this in a moment), specifically arguing against the right and against Donald Trump rather than only studying disinformation across the political spectrum.
Now: ARLIS, where Orr works, is primarily funded by the Department of Defense, and its “core sponsor” is the Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security. You can download the 2021 annual report from ARLIS here, or click on this PDF file:
You can find a description of the laboratory’s $46 million in funding on page 26 of that report:
So a research center largely funded by the military, and specifically sponsored by and aligned with the Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security, is arguing against a likely candidate for President of the United States and his supporters, participating in the work of shaping a political narrative while drawing DOD funds. Orr’s national security work as a military intelligence-funded researcher is to make sure people know that Donald Trump is bad.
This scholar has military funding:
Military intelligence is paying for politics. Military-funded academic researchers have the same academic freedom every other academic researcher has, and Orr has a right to express political opinions. But she’s doing government-funded research into the academic topic of Trump is bad so don’t support him, and that’s a misuse of federal funding and military authority. I assign the failure to the institution, not to the person. (The irony of military-funded academic leftist politics is not hard to spot, but that sort of thing doesn’t seem to matter anymore.)
What’s more, if you click on that link above to the ARLIS annual report, you’ll find this self-description of the organization:
It’s a military intelligence-funded organization that exists, in part, as a “personnel pipeline for the DoD and Intelligence Community…creating pathways into the national security workforce.” And it’s the home of the anti-authoritarian “In Defense of Antifa” scholar, a solid marriage of political activism and the national security state. State and party together, fighting against fascism! Don’t vote for the authoritarian candidate, military intelligence warns.
The much-discussed tangling of lines, here….
….muddies the categories of left and right as we tend to discuss them, and suggests instead the presence of a Court Party and a Country Party, insider and outsider politics. It might be possible to talk me out of that conclusion, but the spectacle of the radical pro-Antifa, anti-authoritarian scholar cashing her military-funded paycheck is nosebleed-inducing, and I need a nap.
I’ve emailed officials at ARLIS — Orr’s email address is not listed on her ARLIS profile — and will post their response if I get one.
Chris, if you lived in the DC metro area for a few years you would be conditioned, and this would not surprise you at all. This is where I learned how that world works, in staff meetings. “After this meeting, get Steny on the phone for me.”
It’s a club. Occasionally you will find someone who understands inside there, but for the most part it’s like a different universe. In there, this woman is mainstream. When Clinton came in, all the real defense intelligence people got the boot. Guys I knew did four tours in Vietnam in the USMC, and then went to work for the agency in Laos or Cambodia. I got to know them because they got fired from there and were replaced by No Bueno types. Clinton was deeply involved with the agency when he was Governor of Arkansas. They used his state as their base for running drugs and munitions for the Contras. This is how he became President. Ask Bill Barr, he knows all about it. After that, these people have been in total control of the country, and this is most unfortunate.
How would one even write satire at this point? Is it possible? What level of genius level creativity must one possess to even think of anything which hasn’t already been done?