Thanks for the link Chris - this is knowledgeable and insightful. Unfortunately, Trump , Hegseth at all by their apparent need to defend continually themselves have kept the controversy going. And to most of the nation this is classic “ inside the Beltway stuff that has nothing to do with their lives. . I would preferred a no classified material disclosed , no harm - no foul - the operation was a success , thank you Mr. Goldberg by delaying the release so as not to jeopardize the operations, and we agree that we were sloppy and messed up, did not fully understand how to secure our Signal conversations and will learn from this.
Absolutely spot on! Posobiec was on this immediately. STFU and stay off CNN , Fox -every media site, particularly Hannity. He warned, “ Get this through your heads- NOBODY is on your side. No matter how hard they try to prove otherwise. Even if they think they are “
Paul Sperry has been reporting on Walz’s connections to Goldberg. Waltz has said he doesn’t know Goldberg but he has in the past spoken at Atlantic Council meetings. Walz’s list of political contributions also seems to be questionable. Whether this information will go anywhere is another matter.
CDR Salamander does a superb job of breaking it down and concludes one key element…why didn’t they have a super duper encrypted net end to end that was not a potentially open source for this kind of mistake. But fear not as CDR Salamander points the CIA had given the green light to Signals use years ago….ah yes the stalwart Citizens In Action! “More tea Georgie! Why yes thank you Sandy will we see you at the Skull and Bones reunion this year at Bohemian Grove?!?!”
It is possible that they used Signal simply for convenience. Like Obama with his Blackberry, the spoiled rich boys didn't want to go through the hassle of encrypted channels or (gasp!) meet in person.
IOW, they did what they wanted to do without first thinking of any possible adverse consequences, like spoiled rich boys do all the damned time because they so rarely suffer any consequences from their own actions.
1) The Biden administration approved and loaded it on government computers during his administration. (Giving incompetence a nod here)
2). Signal is open source. You mean nobody’s figured out work arounds, back doors etc… or even providing innocuous “updates”
3) if the CIA spooks HAVE worked out #2, what a wonderful tool to monitor other gubmint employees, including a new administration. Also, what a wonderful tool to set up non-loyal employees. (Like adding unintentional bcc monitors to a conversation)
I think you’re ignoring that CIA had pre-approved the use of Signal. In the business world, the refusal to use the best available tools eventually results in bankruptcy.
The question in MY mind is why was CIA chosen to evaluate Signal, rather than say, NSA, an agency specifically focused on electronic communications?
John, I think you’re missing that the CIA approved use of this app for “others”. I’d be willing to bet you lunch that they ain’t using this app themselves except to spy on “others”.
Not sure that this crew ade spoiled rich boys, (Tulsi???) I grew up with spoiled rich boys and despised them and as a Marine Infantry Officer know frauds for the most part when I see them. I think they made the mistake of being overconfident and under careful. If you get a chance look for the Substack Post that CDR Salamander put up yesterday it is pretty clear that he is as angry and you and I, but like all Courts Martials we come to extenuating and mitigating circumstances. Are they guilty as charged? You bet. But do we send them all to the gallows so we can start over with another set of Senate hearings, so we can listen to the idiots in the senate blather on? I am for a good old fashioned ass chewing, never let it happen again and ask Elon or Marc Andreessen (or your propellerhead of choice) to develop ASAP OPSEC communications system that is end to end encrypted and can’t be busted into at least easily. As bad as this was it could have been a lot worse and further if results in more robust comms with high levels of OPSEC well then while small it is progress.
If you want “total security,” then the system won’t use the internet or commercial airwaves, so you’re back to the “high side.”
The apparent weakness in the government’s use of Signal is the user’s unlimited discretion in who to add to the group. Seems to me if you replace the existing commercial membership invitation module with the high-side limited population, the identified problem is solved.
I’m not willing to presume evil intent in the public absence of evidence, but as Desi used to say “Luceeee, you got some ‘splainin’ to do!” I would hope they’d have Kash Patel’s investigators in as neutral fact finders. Any invocation of the 5A would get a hand truck ride out the door by the dumpsters.
That’s the most likely way the reporter got on the conversation! It wouldn’t be the first time that a bureaucrat leaked things in an attempt to effect change.
I just read her bio. Gender studies. Paid a “six figure settlement” to a guy she listed as a masher. And people trust her, why exactly? There’s a name for her kind, but I won’t use it here.
"writer in residence", "participates in intellectual life", "hosts a salon", "mentors students" (I really hope not). Sounds like she has a sinecure and cruises the campus starbucks.
Man who makes unwanted advances to women—Merriam-Webster.
“Shitty Media Men was a crowdsourced Google spreadsheet created in October 2017 that collected allegations and rumors of sexual misconduct by about 70 men in the media industry, particularly in New York City. Moira Donegan, a former assistant editor at The New Republic, initially began the spreadsheet online anonymously.
In October 2018, writer Stephen Elliott sued Donegan for defamation over his inclusion in the list. The lawsuit was settled in March 2023, with Elliott receiving a six-figure settlement from Donegan.” —Wikipedia ‘Shitty Media Men’
“Sometimes that shark looks right at ya. Right into your eyes. And the thing about a shark is she’s got lifeless eyes. Black eyes. Like a doll’s eyes. When she comes at ya, she doesn’t even seem to be livin’…”
She wouldn't make it through our Friday night fight class 🤣 "Moira, you're on the mat against X" Moira was last seen running for the exit, weeping. And, she didn't bow out. Disrespect! 🤣
She wouldn’t last a day in recruit training either at Parris Island or San Diego. Even with our watered down training “Thanks to DEI and General Eric Smith Commandant of the USMC and hoping for a starring role in this nit wits next article; the first time the DI’s ripped up her poorly made rack just to mess with her head, she would run from the squad bay screaming “misogynist bigoted racists!” The problem would be that the DI was a woman Marine of mixed Hispanic and Black heritage who joined the Corps for a better life and a way forward and was a crew chief in a Blackhawk helicopter flying ammo and chow to the Forward Operating Base in the middle of nowhere Afghanistan….details matter….
Chris, the Medal of Valor to you for reading this shit. I just can’t. I can’t do it. Our Moira suffers from something all too common these days: feelings in place of facts.
And announced with such verve. Love the verb choices: piped up, chimed in. She would absolutely wilt in a room with those guys. That’s why she stays in the Institute.
For a few days I've been coming around to the idea that an untrustworthy staffer with leftist leanings was the one who put Goldberg on the chat just so these useless dweebs could rattle on about how terrible this whole thing is. At the same time they show their own absolute lack of understanding and seriousness.
For sure an underling set it up. I am not a big shot but I am a boss. I don’t set up Zooms or Chats. Someone else does. The underling screwed up, likely deliberately.
Pseudo-intellectualism among the hysterical left is a big problem. Especially when it’s granted permission to spread in the so called institutions of learning. Banks are granting and backing loans for people to become this stupid.
"Moira Donegan is writer in residence for the Clayman Institute, where she participates in the intellectual life of the Institute, hosts its artist salon series, teaches a class in feminist, gender, and sexuality studies, and mentors students, while continuing her own projects and writing. Her criticism, essays, and commentary, which cover the intersection of gender, politics, and the law, have appeared in places such as the New York Times, the New Yorker, the New York Review of Books, the London Review of Books, and Bookforum. Donegan has been an editor at the New Republic and n+1, and currently she writes a column on gender in America for The Guardian."
Not at all clear why the Guardian would have her write about this, although she could be free to write about whatever she wants.
Once you know she is an expert in “feminist, gender and sexuality studies “ you have all the information you need to realize that she will say nothing of substance and spout a lot of emotions.
There's also the possibility, however remote, that Goldberg was added intentionally. I suspected this immediately, but since no discernible strategic reason for doing so has materialized I'm overwhelmingly inclined to accept "accidentally."
I’ll copy and paste my thoughts from another thread reply…
Three tells for me:
1) The Biden administration approved and loaded it on government computers during his administration. (Giving incompetence a nod here)
2). Signal is open source. You mean nobody’s figured out work arounds, back doors etc… or even providing innocuous “updates”?
3) if the CIA spooks HAVE worked out #2, what a wonderful tool to monitor other gubmint employees, including a new administration. Also, what a wonderful tool to set up non-loyal employees. (Like adding unintentional bcc monitors to a conversation)
What makes me SOooo suspicious is that of all additions to a cc or bcc list, who’s the last ones you’d add as a Trump cabinet insider? The list gets pretty short after that. Jeff Goldberg would definitely be on THAT list.
The law has ordinarily been that one who comes into possession of classified information without guile or intent may publish it without fear of prosecution.
That was the issue with Assange -- whether he so actively participated in offering guidance to his source on procuring protected information that he could be considered culpable of wrongdoing versus having information delivered to him without actively participating.
There are other possibilities, i.e., Goldberg was passively joined into the group, at which time he gasped, hit 'mute,' and thereafter shouted "hallelujah!"
Further possibility was that Goldberg, not a popular fellow with non-leftists, was maximally pranked.
Or an 'underling" (the 'pilot error' of publication disasters) just goofed and added Goldberg in. Or was willfully added in by a saboteur.
Noted elsewhere was the idea of admitting a mistake and hoping the kerfuffle would die a peaceful death. I seem to recall that "a mistake was made" was proffered, perhaps by Trump. I could be wrong.
Prognosticators have prognosticated about emissaries to Greenland. With a bit of a wink, we are cautioned to be alerted to who might be persuaded to stay on in Greenland. Vance and Waltz are among the U.S. flag-bearers, so we shall see.
Another curiosity: if Goldberg had been looped into the group chat, wittingly or unwittingly, why would he rush to publish? Why not lurk to his heart's content? Filing this under We May Never Know.
I've looked her up many times before. She authored "shitty little men" - a laundry list of men in her industry (bullshit author) circles that allegedly took part in sexual harassment. In spite of her very badass 1990's leather jacket (that she seems to be wearing in all her "author" photos) she isn't a cool kid, she is a psycho. A well trained psycho. The leftist machine looks for people like her, and tells them they are something that they aren't: intellectuals. Broken, lonely, empty souls, pouring their crazy onto the page with self-righteous vigor. The machine demands it, and the machine rewards it.
The most upsetting result while I was reading this article is that I freely chose to dig into the comments in the Reddit thread that had the screenshots.
I'd love to see the conversations in the last administration, where VP Harris tried to explain to everyone where Yemen actually was (this young woman seems to forget that the "Biden blob" killed people there too, and I'm guessing that the discussions would be just as unnerving to read).
The question remains though - who exactly in the Biden administration was able to find Yemen on a map, let alone participate in a meaningful discussion about that unfortunate stain on the world's underwear?
And there is considerable doubt as to Ms. Harris's ability to explain *** anything.
I'm so over these mean girls (especially the ones who identify as male), it's exhausting. It's just one big circle jerk of crazy people validating each other's psychosis.
Yeah but, this is what it FELT like to her so it's HER truth, HER lived experience, not yours, so you can't gainsay her. And you're a white man so you're bound to think in terms of boring things like STRUCTURE Yuk!
For a sane view from a former US Navy officer who regards the Signal error as significant, and the product of poor discipline:
https://cdrsalamander.substack.com/p/the-signal-i-was-waiting-for
Thanks for the link Chris - this is knowledgeable and insightful. Unfortunately, Trump , Hegseth at all by their apparent need to defend continually themselves have kept the controversy going. And to most of the nation this is classic “ inside the Beltway stuff that has nothing to do with their lives. . I would preferred a no classified material disclosed , no harm - no foul - the operation was a success , thank you Mr. Goldberg by delaying the release so as not to jeopardize the operations, and we agree that we were sloppy and messed up, did not fully understand how to secure our Signal conversations and will learn from this.
It does look like they're keeping it alive by defending themselves instead of just saying they made a mistake. Another lesson to be learned.
Absolutely spot on! Posobiec was on this immediately. STFU and stay off CNN , Fox -every media site, particularly Hannity. He warned, “ Get this through your heads- NOBODY is on your side. No matter how hard they try to prove otherwise. Even if they think they are “
He’s right.
Paul Sperry has been reporting on Walz’s connections to Goldberg. Waltz has said he doesn’t know Goldberg but he has in the past spoken at Atlantic Council meetings. Walz’s list of political contributions also seems to be questionable. Whether this information will go anywhere is another matter.
CDR Salamander does a superb job of breaking it down and concludes one key element…why didn’t they have a super duper encrypted net end to end that was not a potentially open source for this kind of mistake. But fear not as CDR Salamander points the CIA had given the green light to Signals use years ago….ah yes the stalwart Citizens In Action! “More tea Georgie! Why yes thank you Sandy will we see you at the Skull and Bones reunion this year at Bohemian Grove?!?!”
It is possible that they used Signal simply for convenience. Like Obama with his Blackberry, the spoiled rich boys didn't want to go through the hassle of encrypted channels or (gasp!) meet in person.
IOW, they did what they wanted to do without first thinking of any possible adverse consequences, like spoiled rich boys do all the damned time because they so rarely suffer any consequences from their own actions.
That's what the working class is for.
Three tells for me:
1) The Biden administration approved and loaded it on government computers during his administration. (Giving incompetence a nod here)
2). Signal is open source. You mean nobody’s figured out work arounds, back doors etc… or even providing innocuous “updates”
3) if the CIA spooks HAVE worked out #2, what a wonderful tool to monitor other gubmint employees, including a new administration. Also, what a wonderful tool to set up non-loyal employees. (Like adding unintentional bcc monitors to a conversation)
I think you’re ignoring that CIA had pre-approved the use of Signal. In the business world, the refusal to use the best available tools eventually results in bankruptcy.
The question in MY mind is why was CIA chosen to evaluate Signal, rather than say, NSA, an agency specifically focused on electronic communications?
One more question: Who is the expert testimony on what the best available tools are?
I know, very dodgy legal question, and very unpredictable if left to a jury. 😁
“Who is the expert testimony on what the best available tools are?”
Any relevant app publisher – just ask them! 😂
I don't know, but I'm sure some grifting is involved. The CIA and NSA are both corrupt.
John, I think you’re missing that the CIA approved use of this app for “others”. I’d be willing to bet you lunch that they ain’t using this app themselves except to spy on “others”.
I’m totally on board with your sentiment.
https://x.com/Shawn_Farash/status/1904882451035414758
Not sure that this crew ade spoiled rich boys, (Tulsi???) I grew up with spoiled rich boys and despised them and as a Marine Infantry Officer know frauds for the most part when I see them. I think they made the mistake of being overconfident and under careful. If you get a chance look for the Substack Post that CDR Salamander put up yesterday it is pretty clear that he is as angry and you and I, but like all Courts Martials we come to extenuating and mitigating circumstances. Are they guilty as charged? You bet. But do we send them all to the gallows so we can start over with another set of Senate hearings, so we can listen to the idiots in the senate blather on? I am for a good old fashioned ass chewing, never let it happen again and ask Elon or Marc Andreessen (or your propellerhead of choice) to develop ASAP OPSEC communications system that is end to end encrypted and can’t be busted into at least easily. As bad as this was it could have been a lot worse and further if results in more robust comms with high levels of OPSEC well then while small it is progress.
If you want “total security,” then the system won’t use the internet or commercial airwaves, so you’re back to the “high side.”
The apparent weakness in the government’s use of Signal is the user’s unlimited discretion in who to add to the group. Seems to me if you replace the existing commercial membership invitation module with the high-side limited population, the identified problem is solved.
My guess, just a guess, is none of these people set up the Chat. An underling did and likely sabotaged it on purpose.
I’m not willing to presume evil intent in the public absence of evidence, but as Desi used to say “Luceeee, you got some ‘splainin’ to do!” I would hope they’d have Kash Patel’s investigators in as neutral fact finders. Any invocation of the 5A would get a hand truck ride out the door by the dumpsters.
That’s the most likely way the reporter got on the conversation! It wouldn’t be the first time that a bureaucrat leaked things in an attempt to effect change.
People do trust her. That’s the real crazy shit right there.
I just read her bio. Gender studies. Paid a “six figure settlement” to a guy she listed as a masher. And people trust her, why exactly? There’s a name for her kind, but I won’t use it here.
"writer in residence", "participates in intellectual life", "hosts a salon", "mentors students" (I really hope not). Sounds like she has a sinecure and cruises the campus starbucks.
My conclusions also!
She's a cause for the cessation of DEI.
I don't know what a "masher" is in this context. Please enlighten me.
Man who makes unwanted advances to women—Merriam-Webster.
“Shitty Media Men was a crowdsourced Google spreadsheet created in October 2017 that collected allegations and rumors of sexual misconduct by about 70 men in the media industry, particularly in New York City. Moira Donegan, a former assistant editor at The New Republic, initially began the spreadsheet online anonymously.
In October 2018, writer Stephen Elliott sued Donegan for defamation over his inclusion in the list. The lawsuit was settled in March 2023, with Elliott receiving a six-figure settlement from Donegan.” —Wikipedia ‘Shitty Media Men’
Those eyes…
“Sometimes that shark looks right at ya. Right into your eyes. And the thing about a shark is she’s got lifeless eyes. Black eyes. Like a doll’s eyes. When she comes at ya, she doesn’t even seem to be livin’…”
Who is “ she”?.
She would benefit from a hitch in the Marine Corps.
I'll suggest it
She couldn't make it through the first day at boot camp.
Come on, man! She's wearing a (stylized) motorcycle jacket: a tough chick, for certain!
She wouldn't make it through our Friday night fight class 🤣 "Moira, you're on the mat against X" Moira was last seen running for the exit, weeping. And, she didn't bow out. Disrespect! 🤣
Or anyplace where reality is non-optional.
She would benefit from giving her hair a wash.
She should be made to watch the first 30 mins of Full Metal Jacket.
Really, FMJ should just be that first 30 minutes, repeated 4 times to make a feature length film.
If R Lee Ermey was still with us, he’d make a great consultant to Sec Def Hegsteth.
She wouldn’t last a day in recruit training either at Parris Island or San Diego. Even with our watered down training “Thanks to DEI and General Eric Smith Commandant of the USMC and hoping for a starring role in this nit wits next article; the first time the DI’s ripped up her poorly made rack just to mess with her head, she would run from the squad bay screaming “misogynist bigoted racists!” The problem would be that the DI was a woman Marine of mixed Hispanic and Black heritage who joined the Corps for a better life and a way forward and was a crew chief in a Blackhawk helicopter flying ammo and chow to the Forward Operating Base in the middle of nowhere Afghanistan….details matter….
I expect you’re right, but even that experience would do her good. And who knows, maybe she would surprise us.
Chris, the Medal of Valor to you for reading this shit. I just can’t. I can’t do it. Our Moira suffers from something all too common these days: feelings in place of facts.
And announced with such verve. Love the verb choices: piped up, chimed in. She would absolutely wilt in a room with those guys. That’s why she stays in the Institute.
All the adjectives too! That’s where her snark really takes off. Her disdain for the people she is writing about practically drips off the page.
I think she must view herself as a ninja-like wordsmith, verbally eviscerating her foes.
Hi-Yah!
As a woman, I’m embarrassed by this ilk of womanhood. Poisoned at the well of women’s lib which can’t even support women in sports.
For a few days I've been coming around to the idea that an untrustworthy staffer with leftist leanings was the one who put Goldberg on the chat just so these useless dweebs could rattle on about how terrible this whole thing is. At the same time they show their own absolute lack of understanding and seriousness.
For sure an underling set it up. I am not a big shot but I am a boss. I don’t set up Zooms or Chats. Someone else does. The underling screwed up, likely deliberately.
Pseudo-intellectualism among the hysterical left is a big problem. Especially when it’s granted permission to spread in the so called institutions of learning. Banks are granting and backing loans for people to become this stupid.
With that name, I was thinking Irish news columnist, but Stanford (https://gender.stanford.edu/people/moira-donegan) tells us:
"Moira Donegan is writer in residence for the Clayman Institute, where she participates in the intellectual life of the Institute, hosts its artist salon series, teaches a class in feminist, gender, and sexuality studies, and mentors students, while continuing her own projects and writing. Her criticism, essays, and commentary, which cover the intersection of gender, politics, and the law, have appeared in places such as the New York Times, the New Yorker, the New York Review of Books, the London Review of Books, and Bookforum. Donegan has been an editor at the New Republic and n+1, and currently she writes a column on gender in America for The Guardian."
Not at all clear why the Guardian would have her write about this, although she could be free to write about whatever she wants.
Once you know she is an expert in “feminist, gender and sexuality studies “ you have all the information you need to realize that she will say nothing of substance and spout a lot of emotions.
She's the Guardian's resident man hater.
At Stanford, her bio pretty much guarantees man-hating radical feminism.
She’s deep.
As a three day old puddle in Phoenix.
Hahaha. Perfect
Here are the possibilities:
A - Jeffrey Goldberg was added to the group accidentally.
B - Jeffrey Goldberg joined and remained in the group knowingly.
C - The information he saw and shared was not sensitive or classified.
D - The information he saw and shared was sensitive and classified.
If A&C, there is no scandal, and Jeff is a liar who should be prosecuted for slander.
If A&D, upon seeing it, Jeff saved and divulged classified information and should be prosecuted for espionage.
If B&C, Jeff both lied and spied, and he should be prosecuted for slander and espionage.
If B&D, Jeff knowingly, with malice of forethought, spied and should be prosecuted for espionage.
There's also the possibility, however remote, that Goldberg was added intentionally. I suspected this immediately, but since no discernible strategic reason for doing so has materialized I'm overwhelmingly inclined to accept "accidentally."
I’ll copy and paste my thoughts from another thread reply…
Three tells for me:
1) The Biden administration approved and loaded it on government computers during his administration. (Giving incompetence a nod here)
2). Signal is open source. You mean nobody’s figured out work arounds, back doors etc… or even providing innocuous “updates”?
3) if the CIA spooks HAVE worked out #2, what a wonderful tool to monitor other gubmint employees, including a new administration. Also, what a wonderful tool to set up non-loyal employees. (Like adding unintentional bcc monitors to a conversation)
What makes me SOooo suspicious is that of all additions to a cc or bcc list, who’s the last ones you’d add as a Trump cabinet insider? The list gets pretty short after that. Jeff Goldberg would definitely be on THAT list.
The law has ordinarily been that one who comes into possession of classified information without guile or intent may publish it without fear of prosecution.
That was the issue with Assange -- whether he so actively participated in offering guidance to his source on procuring protected information that he could be considered culpable of wrongdoing versus having information delivered to him without actively participating.
There are other possibilities, i.e., Goldberg was passively joined into the group, at which time he gasped, hit 'mute,' and thereafter shouted "hallelujah!"
Further possibility was that Goldberg, not a popular fellow with non-leftists, was maximally pranked.
Or an 'underling" (the 'pilot error' of publication disasters) just goofed and added Goldberg in. Or was willfully added in by a saboteur.
Noted elsewhere was the idea of admitting a mistake and hoping the kerfuffle would die a peaceful death. I seem to recall that "a mistake was made" was proffered, perhaps by Trump. I could be wrong.
Prognosticators have prognosticated about emissaries to Greenland. With a bit of a wink, we are cautioned to be alerted to who might be persuaded to stay on in Greenland. Vance and Waltz are among the U.S. flag-bearers, so we shall see.
Another curiosity: if Goldberg had been looped into the group chat, wittingly or unwittingly, why would he rush to publish? Why not lurk to his heart's content? Filing this under We May Never Know.
I've looked her up many times before. She authored "shitty little men" - a laundry list of men in her industry (bullshit author) circles that allegedly took part in sexual harassment. In spite of her very badass 1990's leather jacket (that she seems to be wearing in all her "author" photos) she isn't a cool kid, she is a psycho. A well trained psycho. The leftist machine looks for people like her, and tells them they are something that they aren't: intellectuals. Broken, lonely, empty souls, pouring their crazy onto the page with self-righteous vigor. The machine demands it, and the machine rewards it.
I see breast and uterine cancer in her future.
That’ll all be resolved by preemptive surgery before that happens…
I love your writing Chris.
The most upsetting result while I was reading this article is that I freely chose to dig into the comments in the Reddit thread that had the screenshots.
I’m not sure why I do this to myself…
As much as I agree with what you're saying, I can't help but feel a bit like I'm watching Tyson fight a guy with downs syndrome.
Moira is 'more to be pitied than scolded' as my granny night have said.
Or Mike Tyson fighting Jake Paul, say for example
Ha, well let's refine that to say prime age Tyson then since apparently Jake Paul was a good match for him.
In any case, I can't help but think when I look at Moiras expression that maybe they left a part out when they made her.
I'd love to see the conversations in the last administration, where VP Harris tried to explain to everyone where Yemen actually was (this young woman seems to forget that the "Biden blob" killed people there too, and I'm guessing that the discussions would be just as unnerving to read).
The question remains though - who exactly in the Biden administration was able to find Yemen on a map, let alone participate in a meaningful discussion about that unfortunate stain on the world's underwear?
And there is considerable doubt as to Ms. Harris's ability to explain *** anything.
Chris has described the whole of the Left in one sentence, and it is a thing of beauty:
"She’s insane, so she thinks everyone else is insane."
She also looks unwell.
I'm so over these mean girls (especially the ones who identify as male), it's exhausting. It's just one big circle jerk of crazy people validating each other's psychosis.
It is a shame that punk rock has faded from the scene. There would no doubt be interest in a group that called themselves The Psychotic Wankers.
Yet another example of crazy. They walk amongst us.
https://www.cf.org/news/maga-hat-meltdown-woman-idd-as-luxury-brand-exec/
Yeah but, this is what it FELT like to her so it's HER truth, HER lived experience, not yours, so you can't gainsay her. And you're a white man so you're bound to think in terms of boring things like STRUCTURE Yuk!