I watched them sweep the Iraq disaster under the rug with ZERO people responsible held accountable (and by "them" I mean our state-run media and/or our media-run state);
I watched them sweep the 2008 banking collapse and bailouts under the rug with ZERO people responsible held accountable (unless by accountable you mean rewarded w bonus money and post-govt jobs on Wall St);
but I really hope I live long enough to see them try to hide this bloated corpse under the rug:
"gender affirmation" surgery is the frontal lobotomy of our time and once the mutilated bodies start piling up—and all these poor deluded children realize that not only can they not have kids they can't even have an orgasm (!)—the trial lawyers will be feasting for years on all the lies and outrageous barbarity.
Please Lord, let me live long enough to see Emperor Newsom's greasy face when he has to answer for why he not only turned this state into an outdoor mental asylum but also why he turned this state into Dr Mengele's laboratory.
In all of this no one cares about the hell the children will be going through. Child abuse is already a “normal thing” in the human condition. We1st world societies foolishly think we’ve done something about that but no, we have not. It’s the big, dark secret of childhood. And now we are adding this new torture and abuse to a child’s world. Just imagine hat these poor kids will be like as adults.
Red states can and must do the inverse, making themselves refuge states, shielding the child from gender confusion and harm thrust upon them by the other parent. Sanctuary states, if you will. Time to turn this shit back on California. Teach them about bullying. Dig?
I went through a pirate stage as a kid. I'm glad my mom didn't have my leg amputated or let me get a hook to replace my hand.
There are many, many things that children aren't mature enough to decide. Big things and little things. If a 9 year old isn't old enough to decide their own bedtime how can they decide to change gender.
This is all just a symptom of a very sick culture.
But, the California state government can't unilaterally declare supremacy over the other 49 states. That's an assertion of independent sovereignty. It sounds like either an appeals court or the Supreme Court will throw the law out.
I don't know how California could take jurisdiction over another state just because California says so, unless that other state also acknowledges the transgender clause. This underscores the need for conservative states to pass protective legislation. "Where Does This End?" is a truly fitting title today.
Well, that is disturbing, but thank you for the information. This all just seems to be going off the rails. After a while, you begin to wonder if there are actual principles involved, misguided though they may be, or if we're dealing with a bunch of people who depraved and just want to burn it all down.
I read the Revolver article right after I read yours, and they're on to something. I really don't like this tit for tat form of lawmaking, but in order to bring some sanity back to the situation, California (and states like it) need to get their hands slapped, hard. I liked this line from Revolver: "Granted, no red state can match the pull of California’s economy and population. But several of them working in concert can." And that's what has to happen. The sane people need to start working together.
It is absolutely about jurisdictional warfare. The trans stuff is a red herring, a dumb culture war test run to warm it up for use against political opposition.
This could change the policy calculus for other states, particularly those near California. If they're trying to protect children, legislators may stop short of banning gender-affirming care because a parent may pick up and move to CA and claim jurisdiction. I imagine a majority of "transgender" kids have broken parent relationships to begin with, so this isn't a marginal issue. Just an initial thought.
And isn’t this like Prop 12 where CA tries to tell other states their laws take priory. Very similar even thought transgender issue doesn’t involve interstate commerce. But hey I’m not a lawyer either. I have some intent.
Shocking Perverse Incentives in SB 107
I watched them sweep the Iraq disaster under the rug with ZERO people responsible held accountable (and by "them" I mean our state-run media and/or our media-run state);
I watched them sweep the 2008 banking collapse and bailouts under the rug with ZERO people responsible held accountable (unless by accountable you mean rewarded w bonus money and post-govt jobs on Wall St);
but I really hope I live long enough to see them try to hide this bloated corpse under the rug:
"gender affirmation" surgery is the frontal lobotomy of our time and once the mutilated bodies start piling up—and all these poor deluded children realize that not only can they not have kids they can't even have an orgasm (!)—the trial lawyers will be feasting for years on all the lies and outrageous barbarity.
Please Lord, let me live long enough to see Emperor Newsom's greasy face when he has to answer for why he not only turned this state into an outdoor mental asylum but also why he turned this state into Dr Mengele's laboratory.
This is a sad, dark day in California history.
In all of this no one cares about the hell the children will be going through. Child abuse is already a “normal thing” in the human condition. We1st world societies foolishly think we’ve done something about that but no, we have not. It’s the big, dark secret of childhood. And now we are adding this new torture and abuse to a child’s world. Just imagine hat these poor kids will be like as adults.
Red states can and must do the inverse, making themselves refuge states, shielding the child from gender confusion and harm thrust upon them by the other parent. Sanctuary states, if you will. Time to turn this shit back on California. Teach them about bullying. Dig?
I went through a pirate stage as a kid. I'm glad my mom didn't have my leg amputated or let me get a hook to replace my hand.
There are many, many things that children aren't mature enough to decide. Big things and little things. If a 9 year old isn't old enough to decide their own bedtime how can they decide to change gender.
This is all just a symptom of a very sick culture.
But, the California state government can't unilaterally declare supremacy over the other 49 states. That's an assertion of independent sovereignty. It sounds like either an appeals court or the Supreme Court will throw the law out.
When are we all going to meet in Nevada and push California into the Pacific? No offense, Chris.
California has gone insane
What is wrong with the legislators in this state? My family lives in the sacramento area. Selling the ranch and leaving CA soon.
OF COURSE it’s Scott Weiner.
I don't know how California could take jurisdiction over another state just because California says so, unless that other state also acknowledges the transgender clause. This underscores the need for conservative states to pass protective legislation. "Where Does This End?" is a truly fitting title today.
Well, that is disturbing, but thank you for the information. This all just seems to be going off the rails. After a while, you begin to wonder if there are actual principles involved, misguided though they may be, or if we're dealing with a bunch of people who depraved and just want to burn it all down.
I read the Revolver article right after I read yours, and they're on to something. I really don't like this tit for tat form of lawmaking, but in order to bring some sanity back to the situation, California (and states like it) need to get their hands slapped, hard. I liked this line from Revolver: "Granted, no red state can match the pull of California’s economy and population. But several of them working in concert can." And that's what has to happen. The sane people need to start working together.
It is absolutely about jurisdictional warfare. The trans stuff is a red herring, a dumb culture war test run to warm it up for use against political opposition.
Bloody hell. I mean.....lost for words.
God, California has the worst laws.
This could change the policy calculus for other states, particularly those near California. If they're trying to protect children, legislators may stop short of banning gender-affirming care because a parent may pick up and move to CA and claim jurisdiction. I imagine a majority of "transgender" kids have broken parent relationships to begin with, so this isn't a marginal issue. Just an initial thought.
And isn’t this like Prop 12 where CA tries to tell other states their laws take priory. Very similar even thought transgender issue doesn’t involve interstate commerce. But hey I’m not a lawyer either. I have some intent.