Hmmm. ..”a bill that penalizes adults who buy children for sex “will be used to target the LGBT community in particular”. Oh really? What exactly is the LGBT community up to that this would be an issue? 🤔🤦🏼♀️
Because it should be targeted! LGBT is a loophole, where heterosexual exploitation and sexualization of children is a no-no, "LGBT" children are just born this way and attacking this lifestyle is "homophobia" and "transphobia".
In the "battle over the meaning of childhood", gay men tell us they were "born that way", which means they want us to understand their desire to achieve orgasm with other men was developing... from infancy. Where do we draw the line? So gay adults look back on their own childhoods and can't really draw a line between when they should and should not have been exploring these desires with other males. Nowadays, every public and school library is equipped with stories of men loving men and becoming daddies and so every three year old boy who attends storytime is asked to consider: will he love men so much that someday, he and his partner will embrace in a very special way that is physically sterile but signifies he is spiritually ready to settle down and purchase a child or two with his partner? I mean, his husband?
All you need to know is the existence of the National Man Boy Love Association. His comment is tacit affirmation that they really are “groomers.” Said another way, his comment means, “We can’t pass this bill as it will criminalize our sex with your children and interfere with our grooming of your kids so we can have even more sex with your children.” “They” always tell you the truth about their actions/intentions if we will only listen to them.
It’s the modern shibboleth of being anti-Trump and anti-Trump-supporter. I’m surprised Katie Couric wasn’t wearing one as she channeled HRC’s “deplorables.”
"This bill is incredibly overbroad, in my opinion,” Wiener argued. As written, it allows for prison terms MERELY for asking for sex with a child, with “no physical contact."
This is the fundamental point that no one seems willing to say. We believe that the habitual state of mind of Scott Wiener is felonious whether he acts on it or not. Desiring the things that he desires makes it right and just to remove him from society, and most definitely any position of authority, whether he carries out the act or not. I mean, it's difficult to even conceive of an innocent case of propositioning a child.
It always seems odd to me that Leftists claim that laws that protect children from sex trafficking will "disproportionately affect" people in the LGBTQ+ community. It sounds as if they are alleging that gay people are "disproportionately" more likely to buy and sell sex with children, which is a very homophobic assertion.
Having "LGBT kids" is a loophole to allow what's not accepted with "regular kids" (having "gay" and "trans" kids is already sexualization, but "heterosexual kids"... sounds weird). A few years ago there were videos of a boy called Desmond dancing in gay clubs while wearing dresses and high heels. A little girl doing the same in front of men would be inappropriate. But the boy just likes wearing girls' clothes, that's it.
That a member of the CA state assembly is still wearing a mask in a public committee hearing in April of 2024 renders her unfit for office. Someone so incapable of rationally judging risk should not be making policy.
Interestingly though, her criticism is accurate: the wealthy and powerful have always desired sexual access to the young and pretty. This is universal from harem girls to court eunuchs. It was Christian anthropology that eradicated this. As our culture is walking away from that anthropology, we are re-embracing the much older Greco-Roman moral code, in which children were valued in accordance with their usefulness (sexual or otherwise) to adults. The Final Pagan Generation by Edward Watts is a great introduction to the differences between these views of the world. Dense. but well worth the read.
“Someone so incapable of rationally judging risk should not be making policy.”
Your dangerous standard would result in 3/4 of the Legislature and 100% of the Exec branch being immediately fired. Accordingly, Guards will be arriving shortly to “escort” you to the re-education camp.
Yeah, I'm not a liberal anymore. The Enlightenment went bust. Nietzsche was right: we killed God and it's just the will to power all the way down now. I don't like it, but that's the world I live in, and pretending otherwise is a delusion. And not being postmodernist, I can't live in a delusion.
The Left has abandoned fair elections, rational discussion, and pluralism. I may not like their rules, but refusing to play by them is a recipe for defeat.
What I can’t comprehend is how the supposedly best educated minds cannot see the mismatch between the principles they advocate and the reality of how human beings deal with each other and themselves.
Plymouth Colony started out as a commune – exclusively volunteer work in the fields, but equal sharing of the harvest. The first Thanksgiving was not in 1621 a year after their arrival, but in 1623, a year after the failed harvest of 1622, and tge same year the communal land was divided @ 1 acre per person, and you got to eat what you grew. It was only then that the Colony had a bountiful harvest, and a feast that fall. It’s interesting that many histories of the Colony completely omit this deadly chapter. More “inconvenient truth.”
I’m a conservative because its principles most closely match what guides man’s actions, and it’s logical reliance on man having a fallen character.
Liberals, despite (or maybe because of) their über-excellent education, are unable to recognize ANY of this, and it baffles me. To expand on Reagan, it’s not just that “they know so much that isn’t so,” it’s that they cling so fervently to those beliefs despite clear facts and repeated utter failures. Talk about “anti-intellectualism.”
Among the 'otherwise', offering one's children for ritual torture & murder in hopes of good harvests or victories in war sticks in my mind from some history podcasts on ancient Central American groups. Of course their 'elite' offered the poors a few coins for substitutes - plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose. Self-anointed elites have a proclivity for the demonic.
Here are some of the random editorial/response thoughts I had while reading this:
Nancy--take off the mask. Oh, (after I see her face) OK, put it back on, but please only sign using ASL instead of talk. Your voice sounds like nails to me. Oh, and take a shower! Did you roll out of bed just in time to make it to this hearing? Pantene Pro V is $5 at Costco.
Scott--how did you make it out of high school alive? You bring the violence deep inside of me right to the surface. I am unsure if I could restrain myself from attacking him if I saw him in person.
Grove--since they did not say the amendments aloud, nor give you more time--you should have answered, "my less-than esteemed pedo groomers from the left--who obviously care more about their own sexual peccadilloes than children--and are admittedly in a death cult--have added amendments to this bill that I, the author, did not approve. If I were to guess what these written amendments are from the ghoulish mask-wearing psycho from Berkeley--I would have to guess they only want sex with a minor a felony on the 25th occurrence.
Back to the mask wearing Nancy: Yes, that is why it is called the oldest, or second oldest profession--but what I didn't expect was a female state senator admitting that they only way she has sex is when she pays someone...
Fbomb these people. They truly deserve to spend a good solid 6 months incarcerated on a pedo ward. Send the women up here to Washington where we allow male rapists to say, "actually, I'm feeling rather pretty today, I'd like to serve my sentence in a women's prison."
Please tell me what is ambiguous AT ALL when an Adult male INSERTS HIS PENUS into an underage, little girl? A child sex slave? WHEN don't you know when YOUR COCK is INSIDE A LITTLEGIRL?
I tell you what, a one ounce piece of LEAD would know INSTANTLY 🤷
As goes California, so goes the nation under Democrat leadership. Yes, they do in fact want to normalize *that* and everything else backwards about this country. It's progressivism alright, progressivism into destruction.
What is it about politicians named Wiener? In New York, Anthony Wiener adopted the name "Carlos Danger", repeatedly texted full-frontal images of himself to others, including underage girls, using his infant son as a prop, and then had his laptop seized, which contained child pornography numbering in the thousands.
And now this guy, Scott Wiener, who becomes Stevie Wonder whenever he's in sniffing distance of pedophilia.
Nice catch. I thought the same thing about the name “John Walker“. Two of them have turned out to be spies. One was a navy piece of shit, and the other one was “Johnny Taliban“.
Natasha Minkser from Smart Justice California warned that a bill that penalizes adults who buy children for sex “will be used to target the LGBT community in particular,” though she didn’t explain the connection.
Well duh. California is trafficking minors across the state line for hormone therapy and sexual mutilations. The trans-identifying idiots are adults who want to sacrifice children. No big surprise there.
“This bill is incredibly overbroad, in my opinion,” Wiener argued. As written, it allows for prison terms merely for asking for sex with a child, with “no physical contact.”
Why doesn’t this idiot set the age for child at 24? I mean we have to carry health insurance on our children if they are still in school til that age. Why not make it the same for trafficking? Might get a little more traction, or more scumbag politicians will put themselves. Then Californian men can go Paul Kersey on them like they should.
Sorry or calling this senator an idiot, but the entire topic is the last thing that really triggers me and republicans do all they can to sit on the losing end of every argument. They need to go on the attack and make accusations when needed. Pigeon hole democrats and hang this home on their neck until they fear the accusations. Grow balls people. Rent a wood chipper and throw some carcasses through it on camera to stress a point. Make them fear you. You’re talking about a government who can’t even control homeless shitting on the sidewalk. You think they can control an angry electorate?
Obviously, the slime who are in the California state government and school system never venture out of their protective social bubble, otherwise normal people would shame them so hard if not beat them half to death they will have a come to Jesus moment, repent and slink back under the rocks from which they came, never to be seen or heard from again. I wish.
Will be offline until Wednesday morning, trying to purge the California legislature from my mind.
Hmmm. ..”a bill that penalizes adults who buy children for sex “will be used to target the LGBT community in particular”. Oh really? What exactly is the LGBT community up to that this would be an issue? 🤔🤦🏼♀️
That sounds like a tacit admission of something worth following up with. Too bad no one who matters will do so.
We all know what they’re up to.
Because it should be targeted! LGBT is a loophole, where heterosexual exploitation and sexualization of children is a no-no, "LGBT" children are just born this way and attacking this lifestyle is "homophobia" and "transphobia".
In the "battle over the meaning of childhood", gay men tell us they were "born that way", which means they want us to understand their desire to achieve orgasm with other men was developing... from infancy. Where do we draw the line? So gay adults look back on their own childhoods and can't really draw a line between when they should and should not have been exploring these desires with other males. Nowadays, every public and school library is equipped with stories of men loving men and becoming daddies and so every three year old boy who attends storytime is asked to consider: will he love men so much that someday, he and his partner will embrace in a very special way that is physically sterile but signifies he is spiritually ready to settle down and purchase a child or two with his partner? I mean, his husband?
Identifying as peter pan maybe.
All you need to know is the existence of the National Man Boy Love Association. His comment is tacit affirmation that they really are “groomers.” Said another way, his comment means, “We can’t pass this bill as it will criminalize our sex with your children and interfere with our grooming of your kids so we can have even more sex with your children.” “They” always tell you the truth about their actions/intentions if we will only listen to them.
Liberals want to make it legal to f--k ch-ldren. That's the end game of all of this LGBT bullshit.
Absolutely! I heard a gay commenter once say, "Make no mistake. All of this is to lower the age of consent."
Scott Weiner is a groomer predator
He's the prime mover that got knowingly giving someone HIV moved from a felony to a misdemeanor in California.
Knowingly giving someone an incurable disease. This guy is evil.
bsn
Yes, he is. I call them demons, whether they're real ones or not, it's an apt description.
I was thinking the exact same thing, except I was thinking groomer pedo. So he's a pedo groomer predator.
bsn
Mr. Weiner is one.
He’d be thrilled at the prospect of metamorphosing into all penis.
What is with the masks four years later?! So bizarre.
I never agreed to wear one for the Plandemic but to be honest, I might make an exception if I had to be anywhere near that Wiener creep.
Yes, lord only knows what he exudes from his being.
It’s the modern shibboleth of being anti-Trump and anti-Trump-supporter. I’m surprised Katie Couric wasn’t wearing one as she channeled HRC’s “deplorables.”
"This bill is incredibly overbroad, in my opinion,” Wiener argued. As written, it allows for prison terms MERELY for asking for sex with a child, with “no physical contact."
WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK
Right? I mean, I only SAID I'll pay you fifty bucks to fuck that toddler, what's the big deal?
I stare at them, and I can't quite process it.
This is the fundamental point that no one seems willing to say. We believe that the habitual state of mind of Scott Wiener is felonious whether he acts on it or not. Desiring the things that he desires makes it right and just to remove him from society, and most definitely any position of authority, whether he carries out the act or not. I mean, it's difficult to even conceive of an innocent case of propositioning a child.
It always seems odd to me that Leftists claim that laws that protect children from sex trafficking will "disproportionately affect" people in the LGBTQ+ community. It sounds as if they are alleging that gay people are "disproportionately" more likely to buy and sell sex with children, which is a very homophobic assertion.
But likely true and they know it.
Bingo - & they don’t seem to realize what they’re saying.
Or more correctly a “Childsafetyphobic” reality.
We all know what they’re after.
Having "LGBT kids" is a loophole to allow what's not accepted with "regular kids" (having "gay" and "trans" kids is already sexualization, but "heterosexual kids"... sounds weird). A few years ago there were videos of a boy called Desmond dancing in gay clubs while wearing dresses and high heels. A little girl doing the same in front of men would be inappropriate. But the boy just likes wearing girls' clothes, that's it.
That a member of the CA state assembly is still wearing a mask in a public committee hearing in April of 2024 renders her unfit for office. Someone so incapable of rationally judging risk should not be making policy.
Interestingly though, her criticism is accurate: the wealthy and powerful have always desired sexual access to the young and pretty. This is universal from harem girls to court eunuchs. It was Christian anthropology that eradicated this. As our culture is walking away from that anthropology, we are re-embracing the much older Greco-Roman moral code, in which children were valued in accordance with their usefulness (sexual or otherwise) to adults. The Final Pagan Generation by Edward Watts is a great introduction to the differences between these views of the world. Dense. but well worth the read.
Tried to find it on Audible...may actually have to READ this book instead of listen...
bsn
Yeah, it's a dense 800 pages. Audiobook would not work well for this.
“Someone so incapable of rationally judging risk should not be making policy.”
Your dangerous standard would result in 3/4 of the Legislature and 100% of the Exec branch being immediately fired. Accordingly, Guards will be arriving shortly to “escort” you to the re-education camp.
Yeah, I'm not a liberal anymore. The Enlightenment went bust. Nietzsche was right: we killed God and it's just the will to power all the way down now. I don't like it, but that's the world I live in, and pretending otherwise is a delusion. And not being postmodernist, I can't live in a delusion.
The Left has abandoned fair elections, rational discussion, and pluralism. I may not like their rules, but refusing to play by them is a recipe for defeat.
👍😢
What I can’t comprehend is how the supposedly best educated minds cannot see the mismatch between the principles they advocate and the reality of how human beings deal with each other and themselves.
Plymouth Colony started out as a commune – exclusively volunteer work in the fields, but equal sharing of the harvest. The first Thanksgiving was not in 1621 a year after their arrival, but in 1623, a year after the failed harvest of 1622, and tge same year the communal land was divided @ 1 acre per person, and you got to eat what you grew. It was only then that the Colony had a bountiful harvest, and a feast that fall. It’s interesting that many histories of the Colony completely omit this deadly chapter. More “inconvenient truth.”
I’m a conservative because its principles most closely match what guides man’s actions, and it’s logical reliance on man having a fallen character.
Liberals, despite (or maybe because of) their über-excellent education, are unable to recognize ANY of this, and it baffles me. To expand on Reagan, it’s not just that “they know so much that isn’t so,” it’s that they cling so fervently to those beliefs despite clear facts and repeated utter failures. Talk about “anti-intellectualism.”
Among the 'otherwise', offering one's children for ritual torture & murder in hopes of good harvests or victories in war sticks in my mind from some history podcasts on ancient Central American groups. Of course their 'elite' offered the poors a few coins for substitutes - plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose. Self-anointed elites have a proclivity for the demonic.
Thank you for the recommendation. Seems like an interesting read
At its most basic, we ask the government to do two things: protect our sovereign border and help protect our children. Yet, here we are.
The problem is you ask. What’s your problem, you forget who works for whom?
Here are some of the random editorial/response thoughts I had while reading this:
Nancy--take off the mask. Oh, (after I see her face) OK, put it back on, but please only sign using ASL instead of talk. Your voice sounds like nails to me. Oh, and take a shower! Did you roll out of bed just in time to make it to this hearing? Pantene Pro V is $5 at Costco.
Scott--how did you make it out of high school alive? You bring the violence deep inside of me right to the surface. I am unsure if I could restrain myself from attacking him if I saw him in person.
Grove--since they did not say the amendments aloud, nor give you more time--you should have answered, "my less-than esteemed pedo groomers from the left--who obviously care more about their own sexual peccadilloes than children--and are admittedly in a death cult--have added amendments to this bill that I, the author, did not approve. If I were to guess what these written amendments are from the ghoulish mask-wearing psycho from Berkeley--I would have to guess they only want sex with a minor a felony on the 25th occurrence.
Back to the mask wearing Nancy: Yes, that is why it is called the oldest, or second oldest profession--but what I didn't expect was a female state senator admitting that they only way she has sex is when she pays someone...
Fbomb these people. They truly deserve to spend a good solid 6 months incarcerated on a pedo ward. Send the women up here to Washington where we allow male rapists to say, "actually, I'm feeling rather pretty today, I'd like to serve my sentence in a women's prison."
bsn
I'm with you on all points!
Please tell me what is ambiguous AT ALL when an Adult male INSERTS HIS PENUS into an underage, little girl? A child sex slave? WHEN don't you know when YOUR COCK is INSIDE A LITTLEGIRL?
I tell you what, a one ounce piece of LEAD would know INSTANTLY 🤷
As goes California, so goes the nation under Democrat leadership. Yes, they do in fact want to normalize *that* and everything else backwards about this country. It's progressivism alright, progressivism into destruction.
What is it about politicians named Wiener? In New York, Anthony Wiener adopted the name "Carlos Danger", repeatedly texted full-frontal images of himself to others, including underage girls, using his infant son as a prop, and then had his laptop seized, which contained child pornography numbering in the thousands.
And now this guy, Scott Wiener, who becomes Stevie Wonder whenever he's in sniffing distance of pedophilia.
Must be something in the name.
Nice catch. I thought the same thing about the name “John Walker“. Two of them have turned out to be spies. One was a navy piece of shit, and the other one was “Johnny Taliban“.
bsn
My friend's father-in-law is named John Walker.
I wouldn’t give him classified information!!
bsn
He's in his late 90s, he's mostly blind and mostly deaf, he'd never hear me. 😉😊😋
Still…could just be a very clever disguise…
bsn
Thanks for that chuckle and smile, Brian!
Maybe they're related. (I'm only kinda serious.)
Natasha Minkser from Smart Justice California warned that a bill that penalizes adults who buy children for sex “will be used to target the LGBT community in particular,” though she didn’t explain the connection.
Well duh. California is trafficking minors across the state line for hormone therapy and sexual mutilations. The trans-identifying idiots are adults who want to sacrifice children. No big surprise there.
“This bill is incredibly overbroad, in my opinion,” Wiener argued. As written, it allows for prison terms merely for asking for sex with a child, with “no physical contact.”
Says the creepy pedophile.
If an adult uses minors as a fetish, this adult is a pervert, not a drag queen.
If an adult uses minors as a fetish, he's a pedophile and a pervert.
That adult deserves the chipper punishment.
Why doesn’t this idiot set the age for child at 24? I mean we have to carry health insurance on our children if they are still in school til that age. Why not make it the same for trafficking? Might get a little more traction, or more scumbag politicians will put themselves. Then Californian men can go Paul Kersey on them like they should.
Sorry or calling this senator an idiot, but the entire topic is the last thing that really triggers me and republicans do all they can to sit on the losing end of every argument. They need to go on the attack and make accusations when needed. Pigeon hole democrats and hang this home on their neck until they fear the accusations. Grow balls people. Rent a wood chipper and throw some carcasses through it on camera to stress a point. Make them fear you. You’re talking about a government who can’t even control homeless shitting on the sidewalk. You think they can control an angry electorate?
First paragraph should say out instead of put. Second paragraph should say yoke where it says home.
Can’t stand how my phone will change words publishing a post. Requiring me to rewrite a word four times before It sticks at times.
If you access your comment via the web, you can edit it after posting.
Obviously, the slime who are in the California state government and school system never venture out of their protective social bubble, otherwise normal people would shame them so hard if not beat them half to death they will have a come to Jesus moment, repent and slink back under the rocks from which they came, never to be seen or heard from again. I wish.