Well, I guess if you have six children, or more commonly, six grandchildren, I'm sure it won't bother you to lose one of them to myocarditis. I mean, it's only one in six. Come on, man!
This study was small but significant because it tested the heart health of participants before vaccination giving a baseline for comparison. The results are obviously terrible. Yet these so called scientists continued to encourage vaccination.
I struggled with my wife not to vax our kids. Now she accepts that it was a good idea. She sees that most people who are getting sick over the last year are vaxxed and boosted.
I feel really bad for those kids damaged by parents not being a bit more cautious about the vax.
They just don't know that it's an experimental gene therapy. I told my buddy that and he thought I was nuts. "It's a vaccine just like the flu vaccine. They wouldn't approve it if it were dangerous. I know tons of people that got the vaccine and they're ok. These vaccines are miraculous and saved us all from the pandemic. I guess you never heard about the small pox vaccine getting rid of small pox..." And on and on. That's what they hear 24/7.
Thank heavens it's only kids, you know the ones that trust adults to look out for them, and not anyone important, like a Pfizer whore at the CDC or NIH. Kids are expendable, apparently not our future after all!
This feels like one of those genius moments in a courtroom drama. Where an attorney makes some exaggerated statement just to get the witness to finally admit to something less egregious. When they literally would admit to nothing at all. Like yesterday. Two months ago it was still “safe and effective”. Today it’s “calm down, it’s just one in six! Oh, crap...”
Do they understand this doesn’t qualify as rare? I mean, even the critics usually say “rare side effects,” so can we finally drop the pretense? Drop the word “rare”?
I wonder if the fact checkers could give us a side-by-side comparison with the rate of cardiovascular complications from the virus itself. I mean, it would be relevant to weighing the risks vs benefits of the vaccine and all.
"Only 1 in 6 teenagers had their hearts damaged by the vaccine! See it's not so bad!"
How many had their hearts damaged by the actual virus?
"Oh, um, about 1 in 1,000 ... But the vaccine is MUCH safer than those conspiracy theorist antivaxxers claim!"
Very good point. Plus part of the problem, like the recently bruited report on increased dementia from Covid, is that it is hard to know who actually has had Covid. Likely those who had Covid are those who most suffered from it and were properly diagnosed. Likely many more were never diagnosed but had Covid. So, the 1 in 1,000 is actually likely lower. At the same time, we have a better measure of those who got the vaccine.
The preprint summary says 29.24% had cardiovascular effects. I don't know where they get their 1 in 6. As for damage, the summary isn't saying clearly but I don't think they are claiming even 1 in 6. But I haven't read the study yet.
Our 3 childen and their spouses all got the jabs. Out of the 6, one has already had an ovary removed & she's in her 30's. We really thought one of the other 2 who work in hospitals would be affected first. Or maybe our son who does masonry and exerts himself daily by carrying bundles of bricks up scaffolding. They didn't listen to us even though we stopped all vaxxes after they nearly killed our first child at 2 months. I personally know one 93 yr old who died of "Covid" (didn't accept the ventilator but probably got deadly remdemsivir) and 12 who died shortly after getting the jabs.
Well, I guess if you have six children, or more commonly, six grandchildren, I'm sure it won't bother you to lose one of them to myocarditis. I mean, it's only one in six. Come on, man!
💯🙌🏻
They got us good. 😒
I feel so stupid, now. WHY DIDN'T I GIVE MY OWN TEENAGER THIS WONDERFUL INJECTION!?!?!?
This study was small but significant because it tested the heart health of participants before vaccination giving a baseline for comparison. The results are obviously terrible. Yet these so called scientists continued to encourage vaccination.
I struggled with my wife not to vax our kids. Now she accepts that it was a good idea. She sees that most people who are getting sick over the last year are vaxxed and boosted.
I feel really bad for those kids damaged by parents not being a bit more cautious about the vax.
I can't even imagine the mind of a parent that drags their child in for a shot of an experimental gene therapy.
They just don't know that it's an experimental gene therapy. I told my buddy that and he thought I was nuts. "It's a vaccine just like the flu vaccine. They wouldn't approve it if it were dangerous. I know tons of people that got the vaccine and they're ok. These vaccines are miraculous and saved us all from the pandemic. I guess you never heard about the small pox vaccine getting rid of small pox..." And on and on. That's what they hear 24/7.
Yes and they think it is FDA approved. (which used to mean something, I think. . .)
Thank heavens it's only kids, you know the ones that trust adults to look out for them, and not anyone important, like a Pfizer whore at the CDC or NIH. Kids are expendable, apparently not our future after all!
I mean, we can always make more. Oh, wait, a whole bunch of us can't, now.
Kids have been used as human shields by cowardly adults.
“Mild and temporary” cardiac symptoms in teens. Carry on carry on...
Exactly! It's just their hearts! Totally not even important.
This feels like one of those genius moments in a courtroom drama. Where an attorney makes some exaggerated statement just to get the witness to finally admit to something less egregious. When they literally would admit to nothing at all. Like yesterday. Two months ago it was still “safe and effective”. Today it’s “calm down, it’s just one in six! Oh, crap...”
Do they understand this doesn’t qualify as rare? I mean, even the critics usually say “rare side effects,” so can we finally drop the pretense? Drop the word “rare”?
Exactly. 1 in 6. is not a good thing.
I wonder if the fact checkers could give us a side-by-side comparison with the rate of cardiovascular complications from the virus itself. I mean, it would be relevant to weighing the risks vs benefits of the vaccine and all.
"Only 1 in 6 teenagers had their hearts damaged by the vaccine! See it's not so bad!"
How many had their hearts damaged by the actual virus?
"Oh, um, about 1 in 1,000 ... But the vaccine is MUCH safer than those conspiracy theorist antivaxxers claim!"
They *could*, except that, y'know, they hate you and want you dead...
Very good point. Plus part of the problem, like the recently bruited report on increased dementia from Covid, is that it is hard to know who actually has had Covid. Likely those who had Covid are those who most suffered from it and were properly diagnosed. Likely many more were never diagnosed but had Covid. So, the 1 in 1,000 is actually likely lower. At the same time, we have a better measure of those who got the vaccine.
"mild and temporary heart rhythm changes"! I imagine no one who has had heart rhythm changes would call them mild.
Excitement kills.
Bill Gates is very disappointed.
He was going for 84%.
He can personally have mine.
Nothing to see here. “T’is but a scratch.”
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UijhbHvxWrA
The preprint summary says 29.24% had cardiovascular effects. I don't know where they get their 1 in 6. As for damage, the summary isn't saying clearly but I don't think they are claiming even 1 in 6. But I haven't read the study yet.
We need accountability.
"accountability" Can't seem to find that word. Anywhere. What does it mean?
Our 3 childen and their spouses all got the jabs. Out of the 6, one has already had an ovary removed & she's in her 30's. We really thought one of the other 2 who work in hospitals would be affected first. Or maybe our son who does masonry and exerts himself daily by carrying bundles of bricks up scaffolding. They didn't listen to us even though we stopped all vaxxes after they nearly killed our first child at 2 months. I personally know one 93 yr old who died of "Covid" (didn't accept the ventilator but probably got deadly remdemsivir) and 12 who died shortly after getting the jabs.
Wow, how can those jackasses even live with themselves?
For a flu that had a 99.8% survival rate; 1/6 is far too many. I have a degree in statistics if you require help with the calculation to compare.