184 Comments

Do any of the sane service members really want to serve in combat with a person that's trying to solve problems between their ears with surgery between their legs?

Carlin had it right:

"When you're born into this world, you're given a ticket to a freak show. And when you're born in America, you're given a front-row seat"

Expand full comment

True. It seems Carlin was (almost) always right.

Expand full comment

Carlin was a raging leftist

Expand full comment

For his day.

His politics would put him center today

Expand full comment

disagree. He was, in fact, ahead of his time with the anti-white vitriol. Talked crap on white people all the time. If he were alive today he would have tds. He may not go along with some of the crazier leftist ideas, but he would counter signal every chance he got to keep in the good graces of the left.

Expand full comment

The entire sleight of hand of transgenderism is that it refuses to be subjected to any external definition, so that it can slip through any means of measurement. You will have those who say "transitioning" is not a criterion for being transgender, and others who say the opposite. Its power over society is that it will morph into whatever allows its cult enforcers to cry-bully someone they want to dominate. 15,000 or 1 million, it doesn't matter because the cultural power to evade facts is part of the plan. Cults can be extremely harmful to the health of a society, and this particular cult is among the worst.

Expand full comment

Advanced Calvinball

Expand full comment

The military was one of the last symbols of a “real” man, therefore it had to be degraded and humiliated and made into a mockery of its original purpose.

Instead of a tool to be used in emergency for the protection of the nation it now looks like a school yard where we can learn that we can all be winners even if we are confused about what sex we are.

Expand full comment

A big part of the paraphilia for men who identify as trans is to place themselves in a traditional surrounding, and then in the most sexist way, humiliate themselves by trying to express exaggerated femininity to the traditional gendered world. Self hatred expressed as fetish. They call it a human rights issue for the sole reason that they demand we pay attention to them. The paraphilia is insatiable that way. Too bad so many well meaning people have not understood how they've been tricked.

Expand full comment

This is the solution--trumpet to everyone that this is about the male orgasm--watch support dry up as people realize how sordid it all is.

Expand full comment

See "The Last Detail", with Jack Nicholson. It´s all about degradation, humiliation and mockery. Also loyalty, friendship and honor.

Expand full comment

…the gap between 45-ish a year and 15,000 seems to be…a little questionable…”

Chris: as usual, you don’t grasp the modern reality. 😂

While 62 is the mandatory retirement age for all enlisted, warrant, and commissioned members below flag rank (64 for flag officers), there are discretionary exceptions. Trans members are the most prominent example due to their exceptional lethality as war fighters and their extraordinary longevity:

15K members @ 45 a year means the oldest joined the military 333 yrs ago. I’m somewhat dubious that the British Army or Navy was conducting sex-based amputations in 1691. I AM impressed that a 333 year old soldier or sailor can pass the annual physical training test.

Expand full comment

A perfectly logical explanation!

Expand full comment

So, I can live to 333 , at least, as long as I wear a dress? Can I keep all my parts, and call it a kilt?

Expand full comment

I think the longevity derives from wearing camo (or the British redcoat) while sticking one’s external protuberances into a Cuisinart. (This was problematic for the first 282 yrs, as the Cuisinart only became available in 1973.)

Expand full comment

😂🤣

Expand full comment

First of all, today’s journalist aren’t journalists. They are paid propagandists. Secondly, it doesn’t matter how many transgender people quit the armed forces in the future due to the end of DEI. That number will pale by comparison to the number of people that will sign up for the military once the DEI nonsense is gone.

Expand full comment

Poor Klinger just wanted out of the war. Today he'd get a promotion.

Expand full comment

There was an episode where the Army psychiatrist—Sydney, if memory serves—offers Klinger a discharge if he says he’s a homosexual. Klinger proudly refuses. Whatever—it was a very funny show for the first several years. The point of Klinger is that a man dressed as a woman is a guaranteed laugh. Always will be.

Expand full comment

Monty Python understood this!

Expand full comment

I sent a clip of “The Lumberjack Song” to my trans (autogynephiliac) brother and he told me it was a hate crime.

Expand full comment

Yup. Using the ‘hate’ trope. Sure has gotten stale.

Expand full comment

And Kids in the Hall.

Expand full comment

Kids in the Hall were masters of drag—even better than (dare I say it?) Python!

Expand full comment

Agreed. Dave Foley, in particular when he was young, could *really* pull off drag well. I remember seeing him in drag in sketches in the earlier seasons and thinking, damn....:

https://www.pinterest.com/pin/dave-foley-in-drag--532269249726018504/

Expand full comment

Yeah—and his voice was great too!

Expand full comment

His character really became deracinated when Radar left and it became the Alan Alda Sermon Show.

Expand full comment

Everything went downhilll when Colonel Blake died in the plane crash.

Expand full comment

Not for the cast of the show. Maclean Stevenson was a first-rate diva and pain in the ass. They killed the character off so he couldn't even come whining back to the show for a cameo, since he never had another significant role.

Expand full comment

Interesting!

Expand full comment

I saw that episode, with the rest of the 11 year series. I remreminded many people of that episode this past decade when the guys and trans narcissists were constantly in the news. And remember it is a comic sight, as it should be, to see men in women's clothing.

Expand full comment

For me, the question to ask of SPARTA Pride is:

"Neither the services nor the DoD will give out the number. So where are you getting yours from?"

Expand full comment

Who will build the next Gaza pier if all the trannies are kicked out? This is a serious national security matter!

Expand full comment

They might work as good flotation devices with those implants.

I mean wasn't it supposed to be a floating pier?

Expand full comment

Maybe an actual engineer? Just saying.

Expand full comment

Ableist!

Expand full comment

I prefer the term Realist, as in I live in the real world, not on X.

What's to stop a mentally ill soldier from fragging his CO when the CO confiscates his panty hose?

"inflict the maximum amount of wounds, death, and destruction on the enemy in the minimum time" George S Patton

Expand full comment

Forget the CO CONFISCATING a sailor’s panty hose. How about WEARING another sailor’s panty hose???

Maybe we should keep Admiral Levine around to answer such questions.

Expand full comment

In 2004 my MI company had to send one platoon to Iraq. I get an email from one of the Soldiers, "...my VA doc says I'm non-deployable."

I answer, "We have our own docs in the Army. Come to drill or I will send the Sheriff."

A couple of weeks later, my 1SG sends me another email with an attachment...basically, "Sir, I think we're going to need to find a replacement for _____."

The Soldier's attached email was truly insane. It read, "...something I've struggled with my entire life...so, uh, um, er...uh, so, I'm a girl."

My initial thought (seriously) was, "How the Fbomb did you make it through MEPS?" (Military Entrance Processing Command...where we duckwalk, bend over and spread them, and many other humiliating physical atrocities to become a member of the Armed Forces.)

This kid was tossed for Gender Dysphoria within 2 weeks. Seriously, have never seen a personnel action acted upon so quickly.

I was pissed because I wanted to make him pay back his GI Bill.

Here is something no one talks about--the moment he made this admission, I had to suspend his access to classified data. He was immediately non-deployable--you cannot deploy in an intelligence role without a clearance.

The number of policies and procedures that must have been changed (and while many were probably bureaucratic BS--many were also soberly designed to protect our lethality, our combat effectiveness, our readiness) to accommodate this tiny group of people.

RUN PETE RUN!!!! We need a warrior as SECDEF.

bsn

Expand full comment

In 2005 I was called up in a group of 200 11-B soldiers from the IRR, for 545 days of active duty for OIF, with orders to report to Fort Benning for inprocessing and assignment. Of the 200 called, maybe 100 were standing in front of the Columbus airport on the required arrival date. Of that group, a REMARKABLE number turned out to have newly acquired debilitating injuries. If only they had known that "I'm a girl" was a thing.

Expand full comment

That is sad and I find it surprising. In 2005, I was still a full on 'drank the Kool-Aid' warmonger. To think less than half of the true 'warrior class, 11B, the essence of boots on ground--those who had actually worn the uniform, been indoctrinated, saluted the flag--that less than half of them would show up amazes me.

I guess this is more of reflection of my naiveté. It wouldn't have occurred to me to not show up. It wouldn't have crossed my mind, I have so bought into our pre-woke, patriotic/traditional view of our county. As much as I might have been a 'rule breaker'/unconventional thinker inside the military--at the core I'm a rule follower. I think that is why COVID/Afghanistan hurts--present tense--so much.

When I was upset with not getting promoted, I eventually had to write a gratitude list to stop pouting. "Opportunity to go to war" was on my list. While I was never a hunter nor a gun owner, I watched "Red Dawn" numerous times in high school. And like possibly 70% of the GenX men who watched that screamed "Wolverines!!!" at some point afterward and fantasized about fighting for our country.

Long tangental rant, but that just blows me away. Thank GOD Trump won and we can begin to try to move back towards the country we all love.

bsn

Expand full comment

Could be the 70 year decline in testosterone?

That, maybe, and many people these days have this oversized sense of entitlement.

My dad who did 2 tours in Vietnam and lost half his "brothers" was disgusted by the feminization in the military. He actually ranted about it up until the day he died.

Expand full comment

Ryan,

Hadn't thought about the low-T, but maybe. The feminization is ubiquitous in our culture by now, not just in the military. Your dad likely witnessed some of the beginnings of it before it swept through our entire country/culture.

bsn

Expand full comment

I use to teach classes that had many recently duscharged service members. The navy veterans told stories that when a long deployment became in the wind, that - magically - a number of the lady sailors would get pregnant. Thus avoiding the ship's deployment. Many of my students were bitter.

Expand full comment

Richard,

I initially misread your post. I understood that 'after long deployments, the female sailors got pregnant...'

I can see both happening. There was an officer I worked with who had 5 or 6 children--and was obviously not deployable for long stretches with those children.

I heard about her before I met her from similar scuttlebutt about 'she's always pregnant before AT (annual training--this is all before the wars). I don't think she ever did deploy for combat, was pretty senior by the time we got into the fray and she was never assigned to a deployable unit. Stayed at HQ.

I don't really have an opinion, her actions never impacted me, but I remember how some people talked about her.

bsn

Expand full comment

*discharged*

Expand full comment

This is fascinating Brian. I'm not sure when you retired, but when did this nonsense start creeping into the military?

Was it during Obamas reign and accelerated during Biden’s?

Expand full comment

I retired in 2015, cannot believe it has been a decade! I don't know when it began. Must have started under Obama--remember the turd Bradley Manning? This is exactly why we suspend access to classified information when someone admits to gender dysphoric beliefs/thoughts.

The IC no longer trusts you. Why/how is this controversial? I think Obama pardoned this turd. Insane.

bsn

Expand full comment

This started in earnest under Clinton. That was when senior staff ncos would gather upball the non ncos and have a little pow wow where the non rates were told that they did not have to use the chain of command ifbthey had issues they felt us ncos could handle properly. I was even told once when I did have to run one up the flag pole for insubordination that he was having issues at homedue to his girlfriend. At that same time my ex wife had documented post partum depression where I had to leave work at any given time to rake care of our children due to her notbbeing able to get out of bed. Which caused me to receive two formal reprimand by my first sausage for conduct unbecoming. That really pissed me off and realized there was no way I would reenlist if this was happening which it was Corps wide. When the directive came down and first and major sausages started back dooring staff and regular ncos of the chain of command while holding Feet against it in 1996/1997 there were 10000 billets of 0311 sergeants open alone. Meaning 10000 Marine rifleman sergeants told the corps to piss off. Essentially the entire USMC cadre of sergeants left just those two years alone when prior you would have under 1000 separate.

Expand full comment

"Maybe we should debate real things on the basis of accurately measured facts, and expect government agencies to speak truthfully and accurately."

— Chris, Chris, Chris . . . do you even hear yourself? This is crazy talk.

Expand full comment

"A boy can dream, can't he?"

Expand full comment

If you are a civilian and you have a mental health diagnosis of any kind, from PTSD to Phobias, you are not allowed to purchase a firearm. Yet, a diagnosis of gender dysphoria and applying for a sex change doesn't get you kicked out of the military? What gives?

Why should a mentally ill soldier get to stay in and get handed a million-dollar weapons system?

Expand full comment

This is not quite true--the question on the 4473 is "Have you ever been adjudicated as a mental defective OR have you ever been committed to a mental institution?" I have been diagnosed with depression in the past and own many firearms. Not even sure if "mental defective" is PC term anymore, lol.

Expand full comment

Increasing the number of available sex partners. Always the Prime Directive.

Expand full comment

Bingo. Men like to fv*k whether they're gay or not...lol

Expand full comment

So . . . of all the *medical* reasons you can be ineligible for service, the need to constantly be on hormones that sabotage your health while needing to seek regular medical help for a fake vagina or a fake penis . . . is not a reason you can't serve in the military.

I'd say that Joe nee Janet with their fake phallic appendage that doesn't actually allow them to urinate so they're getting constant infections from the catheterizing probably isn't bringing a lot to the table and could, if I were being really uncharitable, be considered worse than dead weight, especially in a combat situation.

I know this seems off topic, but the whole thing is ridiculous. The fact that they can't count the "transgender" soldiers. The fact that we think that someone who is made sicker by using opposite sex hormones or having surgeries that alter their bodies in ways that cause infections and need constant care because they want to cosmetically resemble the opposite sex should be allowed to remain in the military drawing a salary from taxpayers for a job they can't possibly do, unless it's to be a walking "Hate Has No Home Here" sign for the US Armed Forces.

Expand full comment

This is so very good point. Great comment

Expand full comment

X1,000.

Expand full comment

We both know this is a dodge. There are less than 800.

Expand full comment

I said last week that I thought the number that would be affected by a trans ban would be "in the low 100s."

https://chrisbray.substack.com/p/about-the-supposedly-devastating

Expand full comment

Exactly.

There's probably only 15,000 in entire US.

Expand full comment

The defending Transexual rights was never meant to be altruistic. It was always to invent and promote a nonexistent social issue with the intent to sow division, ruin moral, and foster resentment among the ranks.

Expand full comment

Damn you sound like an authentic journalist. The kind who used to write for the WSJ back in the day. Or even my hometown paper the Walla Walla Union-Bulletin. Journalism used to be a noble profession.

Expand full comment

If someone in the military is trying to actively change their gender via hormones and/or surgeries, then they're not in top physical condition and the military is not for them.

However, common sense has gone out the window and few are asking what the function of a military is and the kind of soldiers needed.

Expand full comment

The function of the US military is to promote equity, same way FEMA’s mission of equity is more important than providing actual disaster help.

Expand full comment

…And to teach those citizens that display Trump 2024 yard signs a lesson.

Expand full comment

The actual number of trans service members is not really the issue. That it’s even allowed is a more serious issue. That the Services spend so much energy, effort, money, and brain power is even more serious. That they engage in institutionalized and approved lying about it is the most serious. However Serious, it’s not surprising given their level of dishonesty, cowardice, and outright lies during the COVID DeathVaxx Mandate debacle. These are the signs of a dying regime.

Expand full comment

The actual number is important as a sign of political manipulation. If there are a few hundred trans servicemembers, and they're mostly non-deployable and non-warriors, then the operational disruption caused by their removal would be minimal. But if the armed forces knowingly allow the constant misstatement in the public sphere, the recitation of the "at least 15,000" claim, allowing the false representation of operational danger to stand, then government officials are participating in manipulative fakery. The military is participating in a fraudulent discourse by allowing the fake number to be repeated when they know it's fake.

Expand full comment

Chris, I agree it’s important. It’s just not the most important part of the problem. Allowing the fake number to be repeated when they know it’s fake is more important. (See my reply above about my own Naval service.)

Expand full comment

As a Naval Academy grad (‘77)and former Naval Officer (until 1990) I clearly remember the ONE THING continuously stressed was NOT LYING. On the first day at USNA they taught us about the Honor Code. Repetitively and endlessly we were taught “If you lie, people die.” As a fighter pilot you could survive breaking the flight regulations… you’d be punished but would live to fly another day… unless you lied about breaking the rules. Lie about it and you were gone. It’s gut wrenching and powerfully sad to know that ethos has died and to see the blatant non-stop lying. What have we become?

Expand full comment

The military as an institution problem stemming directly from the flag officers apparent personal lack of accountability and lack of integrity period. Those two topics are grounds for immediate dismissal period. I remember that those two topics are the foundations of our code of ethics and everything g is built upon them period. That the flag corps has abandoned all accountability and integrity is sickening. Even Col. North held up his end during the contra hearings. Righteous wrong he took accountability for what he was involved with. Now none of the perfumed princes would dare to fall on their dildos since swords would be using toxic masculinity words.

Expand full comment

If a fully transitioned person is fit to serve- physically and mentally- fine, but this quasi- bullshit is wrong. As is enlisting solely to receive surgery.

Israel and Australia have allowed transgenders to serve for years, but they must meet the same requirements as every other soldier. They do not receive any special treatment. Nor is there “ DEI” training. Either you’re a soldier or not. Israelis receive the most rigorous training globally, including Krav Maga. They cannot even the slightest flaw. They have enough to contend with. Thing is, there are very few people who qualify as transgender.

What’s been done to our military is despicable.Deliberate. It’s a ploy to institute a permanent draft, male and female. A global one world police state under martial law

Expand full comment

When we consider the societies of Israel and Switzerland and compare them to America, it is clear that all physically fit young people should serve their country in some manner. I was not a happy draftee during the Vietnam War, but I learned discipline and gun control. These are two things that every American should have.

Expand full comment

Charles, Israel is the size of New Jersey, every household in Switzerland is required to have a rifle in possession and trained in its use as a prophylactic in the event of invasion. Most unfortunately for Israel, every day comes with the threat of annihilation.

I too, believe every American should have skin in the game, but Americans should also have a say in who we’re going to war with, why and how it will impact us. Unfortunately, we provoke and invade nations that are not in our best interest, but in the self interests of those profiting from them and not only do we not win, but lose our national treasure- our children and spouses. We kill countless thousands of civilians in nations whose culture is antithetical to ours and force ours on them where it was never wanted . And then the entire region explodes and turns its attention on us.

I the past several decades post ‘Nam, we’ve invaded Irag, Afghanistan, Somalia, Syria, Libya, Ukraine, Niger, Egypt,etc- continuously provoked Russia, funded the most virulent nations and for what? Somebody is benefitting and it isn’t “ We The People”.

Every time we embark on another “ adventure” in the Middle East and Africa, Israel bears the brunt of the retaliation and Islamist terrorism metastasizes globally. And of course, Israel is blamed. Yet the single nation that is the epicenter of terror, the nation whose leadership is hated by its people- Iran- is the only one we leave intact. And it is the nation whose people we screwed over that was modern , secular and an ally. Pre-Ayatollah Iran. The decision made by Dhimmi Carter and “ Zig” Brezinski to back the Marxist/Islamist pal of Osama Bin-Laden, Khomeini. Who had been expelled from every country he set foot in and was hiding out in Pakistan ( sound familiar?) before leading his savage revolution in Iran. Imagine, he wasn’t even Iranian. But Bin-Laden was Saudi Arabian. He was Turkish.

Expand full comment

Traditionally, America invaded foreign nations to steal their resources. More recently, we have established a puppet regime in Ukraine to benefit the Biden Crime Syndicate. It seems that our main product in the USA is the creation of weapons, ammunition, and spies. And the people have no say in what the rapacious military/industrial complex has decided to do. We live under the thumb of a power-hungry gang of perverts and, without a functioning leader in the White House, I would not be surprised if Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, and even Cuba choose to pounce before January 20, 2025.

I wish I didn't live so close to Oak Ridge: that is a natural target.

Expand full comment

And who can forget the comic opera invasion of Grenada.

Expand full comment

Plus the Glory that was Panama!

Expand full comment

Right! How the hell did I let that one slip by?

Expand full comment

Somalia where i was during America's tucking theirbtail and running away from savage Africans while whimp bring was all about the yellow cake uranium the Clinton's were selling to the highest bidders. Apparently the uranium deposits unther thebgroundninnsomalia are number three in the world as far as amount are concerned after the ones in Russia and the US. Our involvement there was to try and fully Somalian into giving us sole access to them instead of selling them toothed highest bidder

Expand full comment

Absolutely, Charles. Now it is to steal their natural resources and sovereignty. Including our own.

Expand full comment