A Chance to Pitch In Against Harmful Idiocy
A Chance to Pitch In Against Harmful Idiocy
Something you can do.
Los Angeles County Public Health Director Barbara Ferrer is the Queen of Fearmongers, an appalling public health scold who still wears a performative mask at her regular press conferences about the dangers of Covid — and never seems to notice that people keep catching her walking around in densely packed public settings without the mask she demands everyone else go on wearing.
Ferrer, whose highest public health credential is a PhD in social welfare studies, infamously supported school mask mandates with a report co-authored by another county employee: her daughter.
Julie Hamill is a lawyer in Southern California, a solo practitioner and a newly elected school board member. On behalf of a community organization, the Alliance of Los Angeles County Parents, she’s suing Ferrer and the county health department — seeking a writ of mandate to prevent future school mask mandates. You can read her complaint here:
Next week, Hamill finally gets to sit Barbara Ferrer down for a deposition, asking her detailed and direct questions about her handling of pandemic measures.
(Brett Morrow is the Los Angeles County Public Health Department’s director of communications — the chief scold’s chief scold.)
The county is represented by SheppardMullin, a Big Law corporation “founded in 1927 and with over 1,000 attorneys across our 16 offices in North America, Europe and Asia.” Hamill is up against that, alone. She’s currently working to hire a court reporter for the depositions. You can pitch in here. I just did. The value of producing a written record of Barbara Ferrer answering direct questions about public health measures justifies the contribution.
I just contributed. I NEVER want to see a mask on a child again.
It is visceral disgust to me and brings me nothing but sorrow to see the littles ones depersoned by cowardly adults!
Chris - I don’t really know the best forum for this comment, or who to contact but I’ve been thinking about how to expand reach of substackers with paid content without making it prohibitively expensive for subscribers. I don’t know what the economics of substack is at this point. Would it make sense to bundle commentary by like minded writers into packages and sell it at a discount? Get ten for the price of six, to provide an example. Because if you want to read a bunch of stackers it may get expensive for some people. In this fashion I think substack may create a more robust economic model and reach a greater audience. Alternatively create a supplemental substack webpage with selected content like a homepage , not all if a creator’s content, and let people access that sampling for a smaller fee and get a taste of the various offerings. Just spitballing.