Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ben Boychuk's avatar

I've never favored term limits. I voted against term limits in California whenever that was on the ballot—1996, I guess. Any time anyone calls for term limits nationally, I say: "Look at California." Term limits empower the permanent bureaucracy. And, as you point out here, the same bad apples cycle through different offices anyway. Also—this is one nobody loves to hear—term limits let voters off the hook.

Politics isn't easy. Democrats learned decades ago how to "game" term limits. They cultivate a deep bench of candidates. They run for—and win!—nonpartisan offices, such as city council and school board seats. Water policy is boring as hell, but elected water boards are very powerful. I've met countless Republican activists who make these quixotic runs for state and even federal office and yet the thought of running for local office is anathema. Very few will entertain the idea. Those who do—and who run successfully—have ended up in the state legislature and, in a couple of cases, Congress. But that's retail politics and ain't nobody got time for that.

Good stuff, as always, Bray.

Expand full comment
the long warred's avatar

At the Federal level we’re electing TV actors who have no power over the actual government of 3 millions and 1-2X as many contractors.

So its all Carnies anyway (TV and the media are full of people who would have been Carnival performers a century ago).

Who knows at the State level.

The real Gerontocracy is the Civil Service, where the multiple offices are held at once to get 2-3 paychecks. The elected are not allowed by law and rules to touch our pure and virtuous civil service with their grubby politics, but that negated the vote. Life is hard choices, eh?

Expand full comment
80 more comments...

No posts