Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Vee's avatar

I don't even agree with everything RFK Jr says, but I'm now much more predisposed to believe RFK Jr after the way Dr Hotez and his supporters have acted over the idea (that crazy idea) of actually just hashing things out in a civil debate between Hotez and RFK Jr.

If you've got the goods, you should be able to defend your stance. This is not a hard concept to understand.

Expand full comment
Josh Passell's avatar

I'm old enough to remember... I forget what. But didn't the Left, where I misspent my youth, always want to "have a conversation" about things? Things of which they disapproved? Never about abortion or immigration, but, you know, Nazi stuff? I seem to recall something about a "National Conversation on Race". Wyoming and West Virginia really getting into it over Pacific Islander issues. I'd listen to that (suggested title "Let's Hear it for the Poi"). But there's been no "conversation", even though it was their idea. We've had lectures on race, tirades and harangues on race, re-education camps and show trials on race, but no I talk/you talk conversations on race. It's almost like they had no intention of "conversing" about race or anything else (suggested title "Let's Hear it for the Ploy"). For black Americans, this may have been just the latest in Democrat Party exploitation (I know, right?). I noticed in the most recent census, black Americans had gone from 13% of the population, as they had long been, to 12%. Recent "immigration" will only dilute their percentage more, as Democrats pivot away from one abused minority to another. The Right was always serious about having a conversation, the Left never. That would have become clear... had we "had the conversation".

Expand full comment
82 more comments...

No posts